Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dembotoz

(16,922 posts)

5. Not that controversial. It covers what my condo insurance does not.what happens with a flood

Reply to Tanuki (Original post)

Sun Sep 10, 2017, 09:32 PM

Sep 2017

I have what is considered minimal risk so rates are pretty low.
What I do think is controversial is u can pay ur regular insurance for years and the find ur lose not covered

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mar-a-lago has flood insurance thru controversial Fed program [View all] Tanuki Sep 2017 OP

I'm all for helping people but Phoenix61 Sep 2017 #1

Sandy (not a hurricane BTW) resulted in 129,360 NFIP claims Not Ruth Sep 2017 #2

That program is yet another example of the government helping rich people become richer. n/t PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #3

Actually, the NFIP only covers up to $250K for the structure TexasBushwhacker Sep 2017 #6

It doesn't matter how much it covers, what matters is who buys it has their rates subsidized... PoliticAverse Sep 2017 #7

I Don't See How tRump Can "Sign Legislation" Without Congress... JimGinPA Sep 2017 #4

Not that controversial. It covers what my condo insurance does not.what happens with a flood dembotoz Sep 2017 #5

Same here. My rates are low as well. I don't live in a high risk property, but do have two streams Tess49 Sep 2017 #8

Cheap piece of mind dembotoz Sep 2017 #11

I agree. It is peace of mind. n/t Tess49 Sep 2017 #12

Much ado about nothing Roy Rolling Sep 2017 #9

The program should simply be redone to exclude the wealthy like Trump and only to help provide cstanleytech Sep 2017 #10