Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Senator Claire McCaskill: "if a single-payer came up to a vote right now I would not vote for it" [View all]JI7
(93,615 posts)30. That's what i said people need to do
If they want single payer convince voters to support it. So they either vote for it themselves if it comes up like in colorado or votes for elected officials who support it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Senator Claire McCaskill: "if a single-payer came up to a vote right now I would not vote for it" [View all]
Pugster
Sep 2017
OP
How about observing that, absent single-payer, we CAN elect a Democrat in Missouri?
brooklynite
Sep 2017
#105
Hmmmmm, isn't buying into Medicarecaid single payer? So its single payer for PEC ... that doesn't
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#2
It sounds like she is endorsing a sort of "public option" (like that originally part of Obamacare).
PoliticAverse
Sep 2017
#5
Right, ... hmmmmm on the face of it letting PeC pay into medicarecade makes sense
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#10
Avoidance of commercial branding specifically for the lowest common denominator is not a problem...
LanternWaste
Sep 2017
#101
If you wish to invoke the Jury system, press the Alert Abuse button at the bottom of the post
Hekate
Sep 2017
#84
Right and she's saying PO for people with pre existing conditions, sounds like a win win
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#56
Well there has to be a better plan in place than just the term "single payer"...
cbdo2007
Sep 2017
#20
How do you get them to support something unless you get out there and convince them?
Autumn
Sep 2017
#28
I think she could help to convince them. She should know why it's a good idea. What happened in CO
Autumn
Sep 2017
#34
Luckily, people can see through this deception. Why hasn't Bernie convinced Vermont??
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#41
You should start a thread about that, someone will rush over and reply. If discussing a
Autumn
Sep 2017
#44
You said she should help convince them. Why not target Bernie with the same smear.
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#52
Get back to me when Bernie says if single payer come up at this time I won't vote for it.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#65
I know, any comment on an elected Democrats actual words is just like a trigger for some people.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#85
You can't say he and John Conyers havn't tried. I give both mad props for their tireless efforts on
Autumn
Sep 2017
#89
I give mad props to CA Assemblyman Rendon, who is the subject of a bogus "recall"
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#91
We lost 2 fine Democrats here in CO because they voted for gun control, that sucked but
Autumn
Sep 2017
#98
Wrong, the "many people" you claim are really Bernie fans outside Rendon's district.
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#99
I don't live in CA, I have no say on what they do with their Reps or their pet issues . That's what.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#124
Then that's a good reason not to attack Senator McCaskill for representing her state.
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#126
Link to where I attacked Senator McCaskill. I'll wait right here for that link.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#128
Link to where I attacked Senator McCaskill like you said I did. I'll wait right here for that link.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#132
LOL, yes, I'm sure your comments about Senator McCaskill were because you fully
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#133
Link to where I attacked Senator McCaskill. I'll wait right here for that link.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#134
So there is no link to an attack by me on Senator McCaskill is what you are admitting.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#144
Last time. There is no link to my criticizing her because I didn't criticize her as you claimed.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#151
It's not just Bernie's position. It's also the position of Senators Booker,Gillibrand. Harris,
Autumn
Sep 2017
#164
LOL, that is hilarious, as I have not seen any comments from you about the threads
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#149
Well one way to help is have your kid stroll out of her $10 million dollar condo and...
Hassin Bin Sober
Sep 2017
#92
The needs of the people will not be met until the people bend the politicians to their will.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#97
I posted about it , look for it in the thread or research what happened here in CO . Bye.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#40
So that you discussed it proves the lie that such a question in't worth a reply is a lie.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#51
Thanks for admitting that single payer is just a "pet subject". That's the point, it's
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#54
You haven't discussed Claire and single payer so I can only assume that your pet subject is
Autumn
Sep 2017
#59
Not convincing. This just looks like a diversion from a pet subject featured in
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#66
You criticized her for not going out an convincing the public that single payer...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#67
And she announced support for a public option for those with only one option under the ACA.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#57
But if something like single payer came up for a fucking vote why would you be this certain ahead of
JCanete
Sep 2017
#94
Sounds like single payer for those who can't get Obamacare packages, doesn't sounds bad on the
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#60
Sanders is just grandstanding. The votes for single payer DO NOT EXIST !!!
Trust Buster
Sep 2017
#47
Obviously I disagree with you, and would love for you to present a real world scenario for getting
JCanete
Sep 2017
#125
But why? Because our health care system is more about social control than, you know, treating people
ck4829
Sep 2017
#61
Because no one has shown that it is feasable and that's very unfortunate.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#78
No, not "ever changing goal posts." I think many (most?) Americans are increasingly open to...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#168
AND it stalled in California. Like Jake Tapper said, those are cobalt blue states, and
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#81
Another issue is that with SP Republicans could dictate what is/isn't covered
Proud Liberal Dem
Sep 2017
#82
This is exactly why I think the best option is to go with a dual tier option like what the French
stevenleser
Sep 2017
#115
Okay, it cannot be assumed that things like this stall because they currently just don't work,
JCanete
Sep 2017
#111
I used to work for a company that provided Medicare services. I can give you one example
stevenleser
Sep 2017
#114
those definitely sound like things we'd want to take into account, and I appreciate your
JCanete
Sep 2017
#118
But how can a person of good-will support massive and radical changes...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#130
she is hypothetically voting no for a hypothetical bill. She's already come down on it on principle
JCanete
Sep 2017
#135
A responsible Senator can't support massive changes based on hypothetical bills IMO.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#143
She is also considering all those currently employed in the health insurance industry
Generic Brad
Sep 2017
#163
Sounds like you are leaving out a LOT of context here, new person. Claire McCaskill is a stalwart...
Hekate
Sep 2017
#83
I have told you...now is not the time. People like the ACA even in red states...not sure that is
Demsrule86
Sep 2017
#88
Yes, I am. I don't have a problem with politicians who are pro-life personally, like Joe Biden,
pnwmom
Sep 2017
#136
She's in a tough re-election race and single payer is deeply unpopular in Mo.
BannonsLiver
Sep 2017
#127