Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Senator Claire McCaskill: "if a single-payer came up to a vote right now I would not vote for it" [View all]JI7
(93,615 posts)31. Even blue state colorado rejected it by huge numbers
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
169 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Senator Claire McCaskill: "if a single-payer came up to a vote right now I would not vote for it" [View all]
Pugster
Sep 2017
OP
How about observing that, absent single-payer, we CAN elect a Democrat in Missouri?
brooklynite
Sep 2017
#105
Hmmmmm, isn't buying into Medicarecaid single payer? So its single payer for PEC ... that doesn't
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#2
It sounds like she is endorsing a sort of "public option" (like that originally part of Obamacare).
PoliticAverse
Sep 2017
#5
Right, ... hmmmmm on the face of it letting PeC pay into medicarecade makes sense
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#10
Avoidance of commercial branding specifically for the lowest common denominator is not a problem...
LanternWaste
Sep 2017
#101
If you wish to invoke the Jury system, press the Alert Abuse button at the bottom of the post
Hekate
Sep 2017
#84
Right and she's saying PO for people with pre existing conditions, sounds like a win win
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#56
Well there has to be a better plan in place than just the term "single payer"...
cbdo2007
Sep 2017
#20
How do you get them to support something unless you get out there and convince them?
Autumn
Sep 2017
#28
I think she could help to convince them. She should know why it's a good idea. What happened in CO
Autumn
Sep 2017
#34
Luckily, people can see through this deception. Why hasn't Bernie convinced Vermont??
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#41
You should start a thread about that, someone will rush over and reply. If discussing a
Autumn
Sep 2017
#44
You said she should help convince them. Why not target Bernie with the same smear.
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#52
Get back to me when Bernie says if single payer come up at this time I won't vote for it.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#65
I know, any comment on an elected Democrats actual words is just like a trigger for some people.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#85
You can't say he and John Conyers havn't tried. I give both mad props for their tireless efforts on
Autumn
Sep 2017
#89
I give mad props to CA Assemblyman Rendon, who is the subject of a bogus "recall"
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#91
We lost 2 fine Democrats here in CO because they voted for gun control, that sucked but
Autumn
Sep 2017
#98
Wrong, the "many people" you claim are really Bernie fans outside Rendon's district.
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#99
I don't live in CA, I have no say on what they do with their Reps or their pet issues . That's what.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#124
Then that's a good reason not to attack Senator McCaskill for representing her state.
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#126
Link to where I attacked Senator McCaskill. I'll wait right here for that link.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#128
Link to where I attacked Senator McCaskill like you said I did. I'll wait right here for that link.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#132
LOL, yes, I'm sure your comments about Senator McCaskill were because you fully
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#133
Link to where I attacked Senator McCaskill. I'll wait right here for that link.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#134
So there is no link to an attack by me on Senator McCaskill is what you are admitting.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#144
Last time. There is no link to my criticizing her because I didn't criticize her as you claimed.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#151
It's not just Bernie's position. It's also the position of Senators Booker,Gillibrand. Harris,
Autumn
Sep 2017
#164
LOL, that is hilarious, as I have not seen any comments from you about the threads
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#149
Well one way to help is have your kid stroll out of her $10 million dollar condo and...
Hassin Bin Sober
Sep 2017
#92
The needs of the people will not be met until the people bend the politicians to their will.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#97
I posted about it , look for it in the thread or research what happened here in CO . Bye.
Autumn
Sep 2017
#40
So that you discussed it proves the lie that such a question in't worth a reply is a lie.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#51
Thanks for admitting that single payer is just a "pet subject". That's the point, it's
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#54
You haven't discussed Claire and single payer so I can only assume that your pet subject is
Autumn
Sep 2017
#59
Not convincing. This just looks like a diversion from a pet subject featured in
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#66
You criticized her for not going out an convincing the public that single payer...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#67
And she announced support for a public option for those with only one option under the ACA.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#57
But if something like single payer came up for a fucking vote why would you be this certain ahead of
JCanete
Sep 2017
#94
Sounds like single payer for those who can't get Obamacare packages, doesn't sounds bad on the
uponit7771
Sep 2017
#60
Sanders is just grandstanding. The votes for single payer DO NOT EXIST !!!
Trust Buster
Sep 2017
#47
Obviously I disagree with you, and would love for you to present a real world scenario for getting
JCanete
Sep 2017
#125
But why? Because our health care system is more about social control than, you know, treating people
ck4829
Sep 2017
#61
Because no one has shown that it is feasable and that's very unfortunate.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#78
No, not "ever changing goal posts." I think many (most?) Americans are increasingly open to...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#168
AND it stalled in California. Like Jake Tapper said, those are cobalt blue states, and
R B Garr
Sep 2017
#81
Another issue is that with SP Republicans could dictate what is/isn't covered
Proud Liberal Dem
Sep 2017
#82
This is exactly why I think the best option is to go with a dual tier option like what the French
stevenleser
Sep 2017
#115
Okay, it cannot be assumed that things like this stall because they currently just don't work,
JCanete
Sep 2017
#111
I used to work for a company that provided Medicare services. I can give you one example
stevenleser
Sep 2017
#114
those definitely sound like things we'd want to take into account, and I appreciate your
JCanete
Sep 2017
#118
But how can a person of good-will support massive and radical changes...
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#130
she is hypothetically voting no for a hypothetical bill. She's already come down on it on principle
JCanete
Sep 2017
#135
A responsible Senator can't support massive changes based on hypothetical bills IMO.
Expecting Rain
Sep 2017
#143
She is also considering all those currently employed in the health insurance industry
Generic Brad
Sep 2017
#163
Sounds like you are leaving out a LOT of context here, new person. Claire McCaskill is a stalwart...
Hekate
Sep 2017
#83
I have told you...now is not the time. People like the ACA even in red states...not sure that is
Demsrule86
Sep 2017
#88
Yes, I am. I don't have a problem with politicians who are pro-life personally, like Joe Biden,
pnwmom
Sep 2017
#136
She's in a tough re-election race and single payer is deeply unpopular in Mo.
BannonsLiver
Sep 2017
#127