Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(51,778 posts)
18. This is the point of the post: What happens if the investigation determines
Tue Sep 12, 2017, 12:57 PM
Sep 2017

that Russian collusion did go as far as change ballot totals?

What if it turns out that he was not legitimately elected?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Impeach him Blues Heron Sep 2017 #1
We have no constitutional mechasim lapfog_1 Sep 2017 #2
The fact that Republicans are taking no action against him... Orrex Sep 2017 #4
This is the point of the post: What happens if the investigation determines Baitball Blogger Sep 2017 #18
Elections are the final resource and the final check and balance. MineralMan Sep 2017 #3
The final *legal* resource Orrex Sep 2017 #5
Power gained illegitimately will always be illegitimate. MineralMan Sep 2017 #12
Yes, but... Orrex Sep 2017 #15
So, your answer is more illegitimacy? MineralMan Sep 2017 #16
I believe that I called it "morally repugnant," so no. Orrex Sep 2017 #19
I agree rock Sep 2017 #6
Agree 1,000,000,000% Nullify and void the entire election BigmanPigman Sep 2017 #34
You've got the right idea Abouttime Sep 2017 #37
If it is shown, Trump was directly involved, he should be impeached. I wish a re-election were Hoyt Sep 2017 #7
I do think it's interesting that we were hoisted by our own petard. Baitball Blogger Sep 2017 #14
+1 leftstreet Sep 2017 #33
Correct. We weren't prepared. Xolodno Sep 2017 #23
We need to hold our own Nuremburg style trials. Initech Sep 2017 #8
I love this idea. bettyellen Sep 2017 #11
Legal execution by lynching after a one-day non-jury court proceeding. Sounds delicious. Fluke a Snooker Sep 2017 #26
I think a serious trial including all involved is in order. bettyellen Sep 2017 #28
Then call it a RICO prosecution, not Nurenberg trial Fluke a Snooker Sep 2017 #29
You seem to be confusing the trial with the sentence handed out? bettyellen Sep 2017 #30
I don't think "being fearless" should be discussed here Fluke a Snooker Sep 2017 #9
By Respecting & Upholding the Constitution. Nothing Else Works vs Russian Goal: Destabilization (nt) FreepFryer Sep 2017 #10
This! Breaking with the Constitution is the worst precedent we could set Amishman Sep 2017 #17
To follow the process, trust the People I'd add: punish the guilty & prevent more interference. (nt) FreepFryer Sep 2017 #22
Any new legal precedent used to remove Trump can & will be used against a Democratic President Lurks Often Sep 2017 #13
THIS bearsfootball516 Sep 2017 #20
Fearless and Imaginative. delisen Sep 2017 #21
Oh, it's a popular position with me. byronius Sep 2017 #24
The right thing to do is follow the remedies proscribed by THE CONSTITUTION. JoeStuckInOH Sep 2017 #25
The core of the investigation is about espionage underthematrix Sep 2017 #27
TREASON .... and penalty to Julius and Ethel Rosenberg trueblue2007 Sep 2017 #31
Just keep locking them up one by one until we get down to the maintenance man if we have to world wide wally Sep 2017 #32
Yup, that's my strategy: Next man up gratuitous Sep 2017 #38
In countries all over the world when elections are deemed illegitimate, Native Sep 2017 #35
That very thing just happened in Kenya. Paladin Sep 2017 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What is the right thing t...»Reply #18