Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Assessing a Clinton argument that the media helped to elect Trump [View all]spanone
(141,454 posts)30. the media gave donald trump $2 Billion of free airtime.
this is the truth.
$2 Billion Worth of Free Media for Donald Trump
Of all the ways Donald Trump has shocked the political system, one of the most significant is how he wins primary after primary with one of the smallest campaign budgets.
He still doesnt have a super PAC. He skimped on ground organization and field offices. Most important, he spent less on television advertising typically the single biggest expenditure for a campaign than any other major candidate, according to an analysis by SMG Delta, a firm that tracks television advertising.
But Mr. Trump is hardly absent from the airwaves. Like all candidates, he benefits from what is known as earned media: news and commentary about his campaign on television, in newspapers and magazines, and on social media. Earned media typically dwarfs paid media in a campaign. The big difference between Mr. Trump and other candidates is that he is far better than any other candidate maybe than any candidate ever at earning media.
No one knows this better than mediaQuant, a firm that tracks media coverage of each candidate and computes a dollar value based on advertising rates. The mentions are weighted by the reach of the media source, meaning how many people were likely to see it. The calculation also includes traditional media of all types, print, broadcast or otherwise, as well as online-only sources like Facebook, Twitter or Reddit.
He still doesnt have a super PAC. He skimped on ground organization and field offices. Most important, he spent less on television advertising typically the single biggest expenditure for a campaign than any other major candidate, according to an analysis by SMG Delta, a firm that tracks television advertising.
But Mr. Trump is hardly absent from the airwaves. Like all candidates, he benefits from what is known as earned media: news and commentary about his campaign on television, in newspapers and magazines, and on social media. Earned media typically dwarfs paid media in a campaign. The big difference between Mr. Trump and other candidates is that he is far better than any other candidate maybe than any candidate ever at earning media.
No one knows this better than mediaQuant, a firm that tracks media coverage of each candidate and computes a dollar value based on advertising rates. The mentions are weighted by the reach of the media source, meaning how many people were likely to see it. The calculation also includes traditional media of all types, print, broadcast or otherwise, as well as online-only sources like Facebook, Twitter or Reddit.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advantage-in-free-media.html?mcubz=0
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Assessing a Clinton argument that the media helped to elect Trump [View all]
Omaha Steve
Sep 2017
OP
As always, the media reports what people want to see. People wanted to see Trump, not necessarily
Hoyt
Sep 2017
#1
They beat us at that game. We weren't prepared. This crap is going to happen every election,
Hoyt
Sep 2017
#7
I don't know about you, but if my team got beat by a biased call, I'd say why the hell
Hoyt
Sep 2017
#29
If Clinton's talk to a union would have attracted more viewers, I bet it would have been on.
Hoyt
Sep 2017
#11
You're making a circular argument. If viewers had been calling in, saying "Show us Trump's empty
Demit
Sep 2017
#15
Sorry, the media have tons of people and rating agencies who determine what will bring in viewers
Hoyt
Sep 2017
#27
Your first link doesn't work, and I don't see how the 2nd one supports your claim.
Demit
Sep 2017
#31
Quit reading pointing at each word. It shows Trump mocking disabled and talking about deporting
Hoyt
Sep 2017
#32
this is not wholly true. The media very frequently reports what it wants the audience to see and
JCanete
Sep 2017
#35
I would like them to specifically name one substantiated crime or scandal that they didn't make up.
haveahart
Sep 2017
#10