Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OxQQme

(2,550 posts)
105. The Silent Generation
Wed Sep 13, 2017, 08:15 AM
Sep 2017

Telephones in the 1950s

The 1950s were prosperous years for the United States and saw many technological and economic advances. One of these forward strides was the widespread adoption of the telephone in American homes and businesses. By the 1950s, roughly two-thirds of American households had at least one telephone, with the percentage growing every year. The core technology was already highly advanced, similar to landline technology in the 21st century, but none of the ancillary technologies like voicemail and text messaging existed yet. It was also a different time in that one company, AT&T, controlled nearly the entire industry.

Telephones in the 1950s had a sleek, shiny appearance but were bulky by 2010s standards. They consisted of a freestanding base with a rotary dial on the front -- as keypads had not yet been introduced. The dial had 10 finger holes in it, corresponding to the digits 1 through 9 and zero. By winding the phone from the correct finger hole, callers could dial any number. Behind the dial was a holster for the receiver. The receiver resembled a horn, with a large earpiece and mouthpiece on either end and a comfortable handgrip in the middle. The base itself housed two bells for the ringer, a spring for the rotary dial, a governor to keep the spring from uncoiling too quickly and various electronic components.

A Regulated Monopoly

In the 1950s, people didn't own their telephones. They rented them from AT&T, which wanted to supply universal telephone service to the country and had consented to become a regulated monopoly in 1913, remaining so for most of the 20th century. During this time, AT&T allowed the Federal Communications Commission to approve its policies and prices. In return, AT&T and its subsidiaries became the sole providers of everything a person needed for telephone service. With only a few exceptions, AT&T owned the phones, the phone lines and the networks, and provided both local and long-distance telephone service to the majority of Americans. AT&T was ruthlessly restrictive about the use of its products and services and regularly sued other companies who manufactured their own devices to attach to AT&T phones or lines. For decades, AT&T won these battles, but in 1956, a court ruling went the other way. This eventually led to other companies being allowed to make products that would modify AT&T products and services, which, decades later, would help unravel AT&T's monopoly.

Aesthetic Stagnation

Telephone aesthetics didn't change much during the 1950s. Since it already controlled the market, AT&T had no reason to offer unnecessary choices and complexity. Consumers had their pick of several different models of freestanding and wall-mounted units, encased in shiny plastic that came in a variety of colors -- mostly black, white and brown, though brighter colors like red and teal were available as well. Otherwise, there was little variety available. This differed greatly from the conventions of the 2010s, where aesthetics are a major competitive selling point.

Technological Innovation

Unlike aesthetics, technological innovations continued apace throughout the 1950s. By the end of the decade, nearly all the remaining manual local telephone exchanges, which required a human operator to connect a local phone call, had been replaced by automatic exchanges although operators remained available for directory assistance. Direct distance dialing also came about in the 1950s, allowing callers to directly dial long-distance numbers without an operator intermediary. Another major change was the gradual phase-out of the named telephone exchange system. Until the 1950s, telephone numbers typically consisted of letters followed by numbers. These letters were mnemonics that mapped to words, making phone numbers easier to remember and served as names for the local telephone exchanges that handled those phone lines. As late as 1955, AT&T was still updating and streamlining this system, but in 1958 began to phase it out in favor of the all-number dialing used today.





Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

until they put back the head phone jack Im keeping my 6 samnsara Sep 2017 #1
I am a long time dedicated Samsung user but if you depend on MuseRider Sep 2017 #10
oh great there goes my back up brand samnsara Sep 2017 #15
I love them MuseRider Sep 2017 #26
I use a $200 Ulefone Power 2 and am happy enough with it. I could afford the S8 but I can't justify OnDoutside Sep 2017 #51
My daughter hates that the iPhone 7 doesn't have the headphone jack NewJeffCT Sep 2017 #35
I hear the iPhone SE has the headphone jack, along with the MineralMan Sep 2017 #38
Look hard at the first gen moto z play Egnever Sep 2017 #92
There is a small adaptor for use with headphones. DeeDeeNY Sep 2017 #56
As I mentioned in another thread, the iPhone X will cost about $10 more a month... brooklynite Sep 2017 #2
I ain't guessing. MineralMan Sep 2017 #3
Yep, people are ridiculous at times n.t FreeState Sep 2017 #7
Not directed at the OP Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #13
Maybe 'the elders' recognize... yallerdawg Sep 2017 #32
Many people will...my stock will do well. brooklynite Sep 2017 #59
Nothing like the excesses of capitalism... yallerdawg Sep 2017 #63
And the profits parked offshore to dodge US taxes. TheBlackAdder Sep 2017 #96
We get it, you are rich. You bring it up a lot. n/t USALiberal Sep 2017 #73
Yes, our "resident 1%er" OhioChick Sep 2017 #80
Wow, I would never post that even if true. n/t USALiberal Sep 2017 #82
Why not? The statement he makes is great. He supports raising taxes on himself and other 1%'ers stevenleser Sep 2017 #94
Marxist fetishism? Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #99
I am a Luddite and proud of it... whistler162 Sep 2017 #100
Just because the payments are spread out doesn't make the price less rediculous. NWCorona Sep 2017 #85
I don't want to hear Mike__M Sep 2017 #4
My ancient Nokia flip phone sounds like a phone MineralMan Sep 2017 #5
Kinda sad, though Mike__M Sep 2017 #16
I used to get lots of calls for Jennifer. They've tapered off MineralMan Sep 2017 #25
What's a "landline"? PJMcK Sep 2017 #39
Can't you say that about any product that minimum wage workers can't afford? FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #6
Hmm...it's a matter of choice, I suppose. MineralMan Sep 2017 #8
It's not just a cell phone though FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #11
I stick close to either home or the office, so most of my work and correspondence is done on ... dawg Sep 2017 #20
Smartphones are now integrated into other things too. FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #24
Sometimes I wonder how much disposable income does DU want people to have. SaschaHM Sep 2017 #9
I think DU is OK JonLP24 Sep 2017 #28
Ouch! PJMcK Sep 2017 #42
Trust me I do JonLP24 Sep 2017 #46
Not everyone is a fan of the passive-aggressive writing style. aikoaiko Sep 2017 #69
The most powerful private equity CEO in the world uses a cheap flip phone. dawg Sep 2017 #12
but he has the latest iPad to do everything else an iPhone does FLPanhandle Sep 2017 #17
I have an $85 Kindle Fire for that stuff. dawg Sep 2017 #19
Yeah, I have an old Kindle Fire, too. MineralMan Sep 2017 #41
What's a "map"? PJMcK Sep 2017 #43
Really. I have a giant road atlas and one of those big map books of MineralMan Sep 2017 #48
do you have a fire hdx? Mosby Sep 2017 #64
No, it's the original issue fire. MineralMan Sep 2017 #71
I used to resist reading books on my Kindle Fire 8.5 eleny Sep 2017 #68
I have a Samsung tablet, 8", I bought on sale at Costco. Ilsa Sep 2017 #88
People eat this stupid junk up all the time. moda253 Sep 2017 #23
I don't think he's trying to do it to appear "in touch". dawg Sep 2017 #34
Yes. I use my flip phone as a phone. I make and receive phone calls on it. MineralMan Sep 2017 #44
or he doesn't need the status symbol or the features of iPhone delisen Sep 2017 #101
Is Apple exempt from anti-corporatist progressivism? delisen Sep 2017 #102
Damn people that have more money! ProgressiveValue Sep 2017 #14
Funny. MineralMan Sep 2017 #45
... Major Nikon Sep 2017 #75
I reject your judgmental condescension DaleFromWPB Sep 2017 #18
just ignore it hardluck Sep 2017 #21
What? You don't know semaphore? jberryhill Sep 2017 #87
Flagged for review Orrex Sep 2017 #106
Cool! MineralMan Sep 2017 #31
Thank you. Trust Buster Sep 2017 #54
Amazon Alexa without a screen? MyNameGoesHere Sep 2017 #61
Cool story! n/t USALiberal Sep 2017 #90
I'm still using a 5s. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2017 #22
My wife just traded her 6+ for an iPhone SE for MineralMan Sep 2017 #29
Say, all you folks trashing me. There really ISN'T an iPrivilege phone, you know. MineralMan Sep 2017 #27
Report: New iPhone Will No Longer Secretly Record Every Word You Say Zorro Sep 2017 #77
What is the difference between driving a Ferari or a used Malibu? Takket Sep 2017 #30
Well, if the Malibu is 1978 or earlier might be worth it, never saw a Ferari before.... snooper2 Sep 2017 #36
Well, you can drive the old Malibu a lot farther between MineralMan Sep 2017 #37
Most of the people I know who own expensive cell phones Sen. Walter Sobchak Sep 2017 #33
Poor people don't get to have nice things. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2017 #40
I don't care either way Sen. Walter Sobchak Sep 2017 #47
I never notice handbags. MineralMan Sep 2017 #49
You can find expensive handbags in thrift stores that don't know any better JonLP24 Sep 2017 #50
I wouldn't know how to identify an expensive handbag. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2017 #52
Coach for the upper middle class. ProgressiveValue Sep 2017 #57
The young have done that for years onenote Sep 2017 #78
September 15. TexasTowelie Sep 2017 #53
Remember the idiots who fell for "how to drill your own headphone jack"? ProgressiveValue Sep 2017 #58
but can it make phone calls? still_one Sep 2017 #55
I wish I had more Apple products than I already have lunasun Sep 2017 #60
Not sure that I'd want to advertise my extreme wealth and privilege like that Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2017 #62
....slow day at the quarry, eh? Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #65
My iPhone never gets a good signal down in the salt mines Major Nikon Sep 2017 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author moondust Sep 2017 #66
Here's an idea. Jakes Progress Sep 2017 #67
No way in hell am I gonna buy one. And here's why. Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #70
Okay. And I won't be buying a holly bush. Jakes Progress Sep 2017 #109
was I being emotional and fit-prone, there? Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #110
To each. Jakes Progress Sep 2017 #111
don't get me started on the cargo shorts Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #112
I want one... Adrahil Sep 2017 #72
Nt aidbo Sep 2017 #74
Looks like a cool device brokephibroke Sep 2017 #79
My S8 works great SHRED Sep 2017 #81
If that's your thing cagefreesoylentgreen Sep 2017 #83
Indeed. AJT Sep 2017 #89
I'm a PC/Android girl crazycatlady Sep 2017 #84
Same here! PC and an Axon ZTE Android phone that takes awesome photos! Half the price. WinkyDink Sep 2017 #98
I like my i5 jalan48 Sep 2017 #86
This may be true for some. erinlough Sep 2017 #91
I guess certain brands of phones are now status symbols. Willie Pep Sep 2017 #93
And here I am in Android Land. backscatter712 Sep 2017 #95
I own a Google Pixel MattBaggins Sep 2017 #97
Once, we needed technology to survive; now, technology needs us to survive. VOX Sep 2017 #103
We could easily afford this, however dkhbrit Sep 2017 #104
The Silent Generation OxQQme Sep 2017 #105
I just saw this on the news, wow, expensive. betsuni Sep 2017 #107
It is wasteful consumerism and represents all that is wrong with society alarimer Sep 2017 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The New Apple iPrivilege ...»Reply #105