Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

genxlib

(6,154 posts)

2. This cannot be allowed

Reply to blondebanshee (Original post)

Thu Sep 14, 2017, 03:50 PM

Sep 2017

Even if none, it reeks of bribery. After all, if not for the legal defense fund, the money would come from their pockets. Having someone else pay it is a direct financial benefit.

At the very least we need to know who their benefactors are.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump ethics watchdog moves to allow anonymous gifts to legal defense funds [View all] blondebanshee Sep 2017 OP

Oh, so Putin can now pay for his defense? louis-t Sep 2017 #1

This cannot be allowed genxlib Sep 2017 #2

Papa Putin! It's like we're living in a dystopian novel blondebanshee Sep 2017 #3

Are Mr. Burns, Chief Wiggum, and Lionel Hutz in charge? Initech Sep 2017 #4