Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dem holdouts on "Medicare For All" have received twice as much insurance industry cash as sponsors [View all]Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)18. Well, well, well. We should start a list. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dem holdouts on "Medicare For All" have received twice as much insurance industry cash as sponsors [View all]
HarmonyRockets
Sep 2017
OP
Why not have a plan for both, run 'em up the flag pole, & see which one flies? nt
Honeycombe8
Sep 2017
#19
Because, after repeal and replace failed, Republicans were starting to accept the idea of a fix.
Trust Buster
Sep 2017
#29
Really and what have they done exactly...you know the will get a score from the CBO and use it
Demsrule86
Sep 2017
#26
Because some self-identified progressives refused to vote for the Democratic nominee, this issue is
still_one
Sep 2017
#4
Nailed it! Pride and vanity from the political-cultists/Stein-voters/non-voters.
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#6
Looking at the dollar amounts, quite a few no votes took less money than the supporters did....
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#5
I figured as much. Democrats being smeared again. Lies and distortions. What a surprise.
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#7
"Not falling for this divisive shit." -Sadly, others will. It stokes the sparks of irrational rage
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#10
Totally ratfucking. When will people take a critical eye before posting such unfounded smears
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#20
You know OpenSecrets reports INDIVIDUAL donation under the name of the company who employs them
emulatorloo
Sep 2017
#9
I tried to explain that to so many people last year- they were brainwashed to think it was all
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#12
If it was an individual donation, why was your company even mentioned?
The Wielding Truth
Sep 2017
#30
So non one can make a donation without it being tied to your employer?
The Wielding Truth
Sep 2017
#37
I guess you've never made a donation. You're required to list your occupation and employer.
tammywammy
Sep 2017
#39
I see. Thanks. Their should be a way to tell the government that this is your donation and has
The Wielding Truth
Sep 2017
#44
You should read up on FEC campaign finance law and details of what's contained in candidates'...
George II
Sep 2017
#13