Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dem holdouts on "Medicare For All" have received twice as much insurance industry cash as sponsors [View all]Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)29. Because, after repeal and replace failed, Republicans were starting to accept the idea of a fix.
Single payer is political dynamite to a Republican politician. This will send them running back to their bunkers. Common sense would indicate that you get the Republicans to participate in a legislative fix to the ACA, THEN Sanders can cry "single payer" all he wants as far as I'm concerned. With millions having ACA policies and vulnerable, the timing of this could not be worse.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dem holdouts on "Medicare For All" have received twice as much insurance industry cash as sponsors [View all]
HarmonyRockets
Sep 2017
OP
Why not have a plan for both, run 'em up the flag pole, & see which one flies? nt
Honeycombe8
Sep 2017
#19
Because, after repeal and replace failed, Republicans were starting to accept the idea of a fix.
Trust Buster
Sep 2017
#29
Really and what have they done exactly...you know the will get a score from the CBO and use it
Demsrule86
Sep 2017
#26
Because some self-identified progressives refused to vote for the Democratic nominee, this issue is
still_one
Sep 2017
#4
Nailed it! Pride and vanity from the political-cultists/Stein-voters/non-voters.
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#6
Looking at the dollar amounts, quite a few no votes took less money than the supporters did....
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#5
I figured as much. Democrats being smeared again. Lies and distortions. What a surprise.
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#7
"Not falling for this divisive shit." -Sadly, others will. It stokes the sparks of irrational rage
NurseJackie
Sep 2017
#10
Totally ratfucking. When will people take a critical eye before posting such unfounded smears
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#20
You know OpenSecrets reports INDIVIDUAL donation under the name of the company who employs them
emulatorloo
Sep 2017
#9
I tried to explain that to so many people last year- they were brainwashed to think it was all
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#12
If it was an individual donation, why was your company even mentioned?
The Wielding Truth
Sep 2017
#30
So non one can make a donation without it being tied to your employer?
The Wielding Truth
Sep 2017
#37
I guess you've never made a donation. You're required to list your occupation and employer.
tammywammy
Sep 2017
#39
I see. Thanks. Their should be a way to tell the government that this is your donation and has
The Wielding Truth
Sep 2017
#44
You should read up on FEC campaign finance law and details of what's contained in candidates'...
George II
Sep 2017
#13