Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Watchfoxheadexplodes (Reply #2)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Got a link to this alleged funding proposal? Lee Adama Sep 2017 #1
Try this link: Atticus Sep 2017 #4
So nothing in the bill he put forward. Lee Adama Sep 2017 #10
I see that you make no comment on the actual funding proposals. And, my OP Atticus Sep 2017 #15
In politics, if you are explaining, you are LOSING! Lee Adama Sep 2017 #18
(could you stop yelling?) We disagree, but I will not call you "fucking Dumb". Atticus Sep 2017 #20
I never called you "fucking DUMB". Lee Adama Sep 2017 #21
You seem to have a hard time responding to what was ACTUALLY written. Atticus Sep 2017 #24
OFFS! Lee Adama Sep 2017 #28
Going for single payer at this moment was incredibly stupid. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #7
It could have been brilliant. Lee Adama Sep 2017 #22
Nope. We have no chance at the moment...the GOP are already using it against us with a CBO score Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #44
I agree with everything you said except for one thing. Lee Adama Sep 2017 #55
I don't think it is budget neutral as it calls for tax hikes. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #57
And a comprehensive transition plan that addresses all points of fallout tymorial Sep 2017 #54
Yep, instead it's nothing but a piece of paper with empty rhetoric. Lee Adama Sep 2017 #56
Fox playing up hard bernies 1987 interview Watchfoxheadexplodes Sep 2017 #2
We have no chance of getting single payer and now we handed the GOP something to attack us with. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #5
Yeah, we should just play it safe and hope that we can salvage a few Atticus Sep 2017 #11
We should be realistic, and yeah when the damn Republicans have all power, we should think Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Snotcicles Sep 2017 #64
A big who cares...it is a plan that won't happen and a complete waste of time...work Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #3
We are all entitled to our opinions. nt Atticus Sep 2017 #6
Of course you do...and my only hope is this doesn't cost us any shot at Congress...a CBO Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #46
I wonder how much it would cost Control-Z Sep 2017 #38
That is how it could happen down the road when we are back in power...but if we lose the ACA, it Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #47
That is definitely the way to go...if you try a big stand alone bill like this one Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #59
Looks like it requires a COMPLETE rework and overhaul of the tax system. Pie. In. The. Sky. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #8
So? ProfessorGAC Sep 2017 #23
LOL NurseJackie Sep 2017 #35
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #43
Good. Let's cut out tax theft from the military contractors n/t leftstreet Sep 2017 #25
LOL NurseJackie Sep 2017 #36
I stand with Booker, Harris, Warren, Franken, and Gillibrand! Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #9
me too Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #12
I wonder what'd happen if he who shall not be named wasn't associated with this particular proposal. Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #14
But the Republicans might say something mean!!! QC Sep 2017 #27
its been working well so far. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #40
I stand with winning in 18 and 20...and we all know the Democratic Senators Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #48
Or, maybe they believe in it. Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #53
Every Senator is running for president...coincidence? Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #58
Uh, actually, there are 13 or so co-sponsors. And no one has announced for 2020. Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #66
He has proposed "taxes," not how much the average Joe will pay, but "taxes." Hoyt Sep 2017 #13
Thank you for a thoughtful response. Perhaps I am naive, but this proposal is--- Atticus Sep 2017 #16
I hear you. He did have this same basic proposal over a year ago, so it's not that new. Hoyt Sep 2017 #26
The problem is... yallerdawg Sep 2017 #17
It won't cost 3.2T. It will cost less than that. As a nation we will realize substantial savings. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #41
Exactly right, putting this bill forward now is madness. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #49
Pretty sure the senator asked to include the funding proposals: TCJ70 Sep 2017 #19
Oh, here is something that came out today that is getting there. Hoyt Sep 2017 #29
I think those numbers are realistic TexasBushwhacker Sep 2017 #39
Really, screwing with workplace insurance will get a party tossed out of power and if you are Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #50
That's a good point. At one time, unions were opposed to meddling with an area Hoyt Sep 2017 #60
Barasso Just Wants His Cut OneBlueDotBama Sep 2017 #30
From his primary website TexasBushwhacker Sep 2017 #31
Thanks for the link and info. We have to be sure this is publicized nationally. Atticus Sep 2017 #32
This pricing is extremely fair IMO Not Ruth Sep 2017 #33
The American people will not support such taxes. And poor people would have to be subsidize for the Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #51
Apparently, Sanders' more recent proposals are bit higher than that. Hoyt Sep 2017 #61
Far too many are "explaining" how it cannot be done. guillaumeb Sep 2017 #34
It's not like this is something new. yallerdawg Sep 2017 #37
Just fixing ACA - it actually can't be fixed. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #42
Yes it can...and such remarks give the GOP joy because he even Democrats say" it can't be fixed..." Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #52
A Public Option is the answer to that. If that is as good as we hope, people will take it Hoyt Sep 2017 #62
To summarize your position as I read it: guillaumeb Sep 2017 #67
We HAVE progress... yallerdawg Sep 2017 #69
We agree. eom guillaumeb Sep 2017 #70
How much of employer savings would go to workers? MichMan Sep 2017 #63
You understand that employees pay premiums, copays, deductibles, and shit insurance didn't pay, Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #68
Another cost savings that is overlooked with Medicare For All is Snotcicles Sep 2017 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe I am mistaken, but ...»Reply #64