Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)

4. Agreed. "NO WE CAN'T" is certainly not a winning electoral slogan.

Reply to Ken Burch (Original post)

Fri Sep 15, 2017, 07:19 PM

Sep 2017

What is considered realistic depends on the situation, but if we decide in advance that nothing significant can be done than we will do nothing significant.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Being "realistic" doesn't mean forever giving up on anything beyond increments. [View all] Ken Burch Sep 2017 OP

who is arguing this? JHan Sep 2017 #1

There have been all these threads emphasizing the need to be "realistic" this week. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #2

I haven't read into those threads that single payer or UHC Is impossible.. JHan Sep 2017 #3

sorry shanny Sep 2017 #5

Agreed. "NO WE CAN'T" is certainly not a winning electoral slogan. guillaumeb Sep 2017 #4