Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. :) Your own argument strikes me as somewhat invalid. That, because action was never
Tue Sep 19, 2017, 02:34 AM
Sep 2017

taken before, it won't be now, even apparently "shouldn't" be now given the notion of a more "proper" way to proceed.

Appropriate as impeachment -- followed by removal from office of course -- might seem of this particular president, it is a huge, hugely drastic, and often not possible step. To close this hole and avoid constitutional crises, removal of a president from office should not be the only avenue open to legislators faced with the need to address abuse of pardon power.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Overturning Arpaio's Pard...»Reply #2