Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 06:43 AM Jul 2012

"Corporations are people, my friend"? [View all]

Obama Administration Backs DISCLOSE Act

The Obama administraiton “strongly supports” the Democracy is Strengthened by Casting Light on Spending in Elections (DISCLOSE) Act, the White House said in a statement of administration policy on Monday. From the statement:

The DISCLOSE Act is a necessary measure to ensure transparency and accountability and to equip Americans with the tools to know who is attempting to influence the Nation’s elections. The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 50 (2010), allowed unlimited corporate and special-interest money in elections, bringing about an era where corporations and other wealthy interests can exert vastly disproportionate influence, including through anonymous donations. Under the DISCLOSE Act, any “covered organization” that spends $10,000 or more on campaign-related disbursements would be required to file a disclosure report with the Federal Election Commission within 24 hours of the expenditure, and to file a new report for each additional $10,000 or more that is spent. In addition, the bill provides mechanisms to allow organizations to keep non-political donations private. In the absence of the disclosure rules in S. 3369, corporations and wealthy individuals will continue to be able to shield their donations from disclosure. Congress should act now to hold corporations and special interests that participate in the Nation’s elections accountable to the American people.

<...>

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/obama-administration-backs-disclose-act


Do you support Citizens United and/or the DISCLOSE ACT
12 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
I support Citizens United, period.
0 (0%)
I support Citizens United, and Im against the DISCLOSE Act
0 (0%)
I'm against Citizens United, and I support the DISCLOSE Act
1 (8%)
I support Citizens United and the DISCLOSE Act
0 (0%)
I'm against Citizens United, and I support the DISCLOSE Act, but it doesn't go far enough
11 (92%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TAX contributions over five thousand dollars at the fifteen percent rate. MADem Jul 2012 #1
It's illegal for corporations to make campaign contributions in Federal elections, Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #10
I'm talking about PAC money, individual money, money from any legal resource. MADem Jul 2012 #24
I'm for public financing of elections, with no other monetary sources. Deep13 Jul 2012 #2
Full campaign finance reform. n/t ProSense Jul 2012 #3
+1 Scuba Jul 2012 #4
Would you allow a corporation to publish a book that criticized an election candidate Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #5
Yes ProSense Jul 2012 #6
So you're OK with a corporation spending a billion dollars to send a book to every voter Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #7
Yeah, ProSense Jul 2012 #8
How about cable TV? On-demand? Satellite? Youtube channels? Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #9
Are you being obtuse? ProSense Jul 2012 #11
Actually I didn't. So I Googled it. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #12
Good ProSense Jul 2012 #14
My feeling is that if the book is published in the usual way... Deep13 Jul 2012 #19
I prefer the full disclosure route to the book-banning route (nt) Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #21
Me too. But I do support banning corporate money for books. Deep13 Jul 2012 #22
Ordinary people can pool their resources with other like-minded folk. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #23
I have the same position as the ACLU on this. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #13
Honestly, that's why I no longer support the ACLU. Deep13 Jul 2012 #20
Interesting that we have one poster who totally support Citizens United. GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #15
Here's the ACLU's explanation of why they support it. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #16
I know they did - And it's one of the few times when I have not been happy with the ACLU. GoneOffShore Jul 2012 #17
Here's a ProSense Jul 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Corporations are pe...