Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dixiegrrrrl

(60,154 posts)

7. 2 possibilities...

Reply to syringis (Reply #6)

Fri Sep 22, 2017, 12:07 AM

Sep 2017

Either she is like her Dad and merely lends her name to the crap that is selling, thus not actually designing the shoes
(she once stated that was her only contribution, her name) thus proving she is as dumb and lazy as the rest of the family

or

She is eyeball deep in ripping off other designers, true to the family grifting genes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

dirtbag Ivanka Trump faces courtroom showdown over $785 sandals [View all] yortsed snacilbuper Sep 2017 OP

For $785 the shoes would have to hold historic relevance for me to buy them. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #1

Just got off the floor (harder now than it was a few years ago btw)..I was rolling around laughing MLAA Sep 2017 #4

I definitely hope she loses this one Warpy Sep 2017 #2

Republican grifters deserve each other Achilleaze Sep 2017 #3

This song goes out to Ivanka daughter -wife in DC... MLAA Sep 2017 #5

She has copied other creations. syringis Sep 2017 #6

2 possibilities... dixiegrrrrl Sep 2017 #7

It is hard to make a choice. syringis Sep 2017 #8

Do you remember this? syringis Sep 2017 #9

Thanks for that reminder. dixiegrrrrl Sep 2017 #10

I think $785 for a pair of shoes is obscene NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #11

Interesting. LAS14 Sep 2017 #12