Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rogue emissary

(3,343 posts)
31. Making any contribution or donation of money or "other thing of value"
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 10:54 AM
Sep 2017

these ads apply just as if a foreign entity tried to buy campaign ads on TV. It's still illegal and falls under the same statutes.

FB admitted the ads were paid for with Russian Rubles and many believe the ad buy was sent from a foreign server.

Soliciting, accepting, or receiving contributions and donations from foreign nationals

The Act prohibits knowingly soliciting, accepting or receiving contributions or donations from foreign nationals. In this context, "knowingly" means that a person:

Has actual knowledge that the funds solicited, accepted, or received are from a foreign national;
Is aware of facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the funds solicited, accepted, or received are likely to be from a foreign national; or
Is aware of facts that would lead a reasonable person to inquire whether the source of the funds solicited, accepted or received is a foreign national.


http://www.thedailybeast.com/congress-will-get-to-see-russias-facebook-propaganda-will-you

Facebook has not actively released details of any of the posts or events to the public, nor has it said how many Kremlin-backed Facebook groups they’ve identified. (A few Kremlin-backed posts and groups covertly posting political content during last year’s election were first identified this year by outlets including The Daily Beast, then later acknowledged by Facebook after those press reports.) The propaganda groups identified so far purchased ads using rubles under the name of a known St. Petersburg troll farm.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I considered deleting my FB account. forgotmylogin Sep 2017 #1
I unsubscribed this past week. democratisphere Sep 2017 #5
How is that against the law? GusBob Sep 2017 #2
Good question. I wonder if anyone will try to answer. onenote Sep 2017 #12
52 U.S.C. 30121 and 11 CFR 110.20 MrsCoffee Sep 2017 #23
Thank you... Deuce Sep 2017 #25
People like Facebook SHRED Sep 2017 #3
But we all once lived without it. I still do. WinkyDink Sep 2017 #7
I've lived without it for its entire existence. It can be done. Iggo Sep 2017 #28
Like almost all tech companies, Facebook is a defacto monopoly DBoon Sep 2017 #37
"Facebook" is not a human. The word is "Zuckerberg." WinkyDink Sep 2017 #4
+1 dalton99a Sep 2017 #11
Ayup. (n/t) Iggo Sep 2017 #29
The almighty dollar rules the world blueinredohio Sep 2017 #6
They now promise to look into things related to the German election Ezior Sep 2017 #8
Help me with my memory here madokie Sep 2017 #9
That was his co-founder, Eduardo Saverin. n/t demmiblue Sep 2017 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author mythology Sep 2017 #21
Remember the Winklevoss!! HAB911 Sep 2017 #10
Just a month ago, Fuckerberg was hinting at running for Presinut. deminks Sep 2017 #13
I can't wait until we see how Zuckerberg personally approved each ad Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #14
I think buying the ads is all automated with no oversight by humans. StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #15
Oh I know Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #16
Is it significant that they sold $.5 billion in stock to a Russian oligarch? StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #18
Sheryl Sandberg weighs in StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #19
Some of the ads were paid for in rubles. That should have given the computers a clue. nt pnwmom Sep 2017 #34
It is that way by design DBoon Sep 2017 #38
What law was broken? sarisataka Sep 2017 #20
At least 52 U.S.C. 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20 rogue emissary Sep 2017 #22
In my, admitted inexpert, opinion sarisataka Sep 2017 #24
Making any contribution or donation of money or "other thing of value" rogue emissary Sep 2017 #31
As I said, I am far from an expert sarisataka Sep 2017 #33
Some of the illegal campaign ads were paid for in rubles. Facebook should have known. pnwmom Sep 2017 #35
Enabled or permitted Not Ruth Sep 2017 #26
That's it. Lie until you can't lie anymore. Fuck you, Zuckerberg. Iggo Sep 2017 #27
I have deactivated my FB account. JNelson6563 Sep 2017 #30
We have seen no evidence that Russian actors bought ads on Facebook in connection ... DK504 Sep 2017 #32
The problem with leaving FB is that that won't shut it down. I prefer to stay there pnwmom Sep 2017 #36
I agree with this. StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #39
I agree that FB is yesterday. But me and many of my friends ARE yesterday, and we vote pnwmom Sep 2017 #40
FB is still a useful platform. StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #41
Some people think that Zuckerberg might have to leave the US over this Not Ruth Sep 2017 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Facebook admits it illega...»Reply #31