Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
9. That is the name of a specific bill, not the term for the system.
Fri Sep 22, 2017, 02:28 PM
Sep 2017

Kaiser Family Foundation is going to use the correct terminology for a system that has had other bills with other names.

And the "Medicare for All" plan differs from Medicare in many ways, so using them interchangeably can lead people to incorrect assumptions about the bill.


http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/medicare-for-all-is-a-misleading-term-for-single-payer.html

For one thing, Medicare is by design an “acute care” program. It does not cover long-term hospital stays or nursing-home care, and excludes some routine care (e.g., dental and vision care). Presumably a single-payer program designed to replace all or most private insurance would be more comprehensive than Medicare.


And therefore much more expensive and complicated than simply "expanding Medicare."

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R Gothmog Sep 2017 #1
K AND R FOR EXPOSURE AND DEBATE DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2017 #2
We should never talk about it. theaocp Sep 2017 #3
I didn't see that at all from the post ehrnst Sep 2017 #5
It is the wrong time now. Save the ACA. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #20
K&R sheshe2 Sep 2017 #4
Truth. nt LexVegas Sep 2017 #6
I wish everyone would call it Medicare For All, as it's named n/t leftstreet Sep 2017 #7
That is the name of a specific bill, not the term for the system. ehrnst Sep 2017 #9
It's what Sanders and the co-sponsors call it leftstreet Sep 2017 #26
I know exactly why Sanders chose it. Medicare is popular. That's good marketing. Good politics. ehrnst Sep 2017 #27
No matter what you call it... Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #12
It's what Sanders and the co-sponsors call it n/t leftstreet Sep 2017 #25
Honestly, I am very angry with all of them. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #28
The article uses correct terminology, as would be applied to any such bill. ehrnst Sep 2017 #32
Thank You Me. Sep 2017 #8
It is very (very) hard to take away benefits once they are established, Expecting Rain Sep 2017 #10
But that's not a post that will get applause. ehrnst Sep 2017 #13
I'd make a very lousy populist demagogue. Expecting Rain Sep 2017 #15
Why do you hate progress? ehrnst Sep 2017 #16
nonsense. you don't decide that. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #21
I agree. brer cat Sep 2017 #17
True. And the "Medicare for All" bill as proposed is different than Medicare as it is. ehrnst Sep 2017 #24
K&R Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #11
The ACA is the farthest down the road we have ever been to UHC. ehrnst Sep 2017 #14
Home now...can type better...hubs had last interview today...and they knew he had an offer so Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #29
Just heard pundit say debate bad idea. On cell Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #18
Good article, ehrnst. brer cat Sep 2017 #19
The ACA is/was market oriented. kentuck Sep 2017 #22
Actually, it's a series of regulations that limits and directs the market in many ways ehrnst Sep 2017 #23
It could work with some tweaks and it is all we have and if goes it is all we ever had. There is no Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #30
The vast majority of countries with universal health care have Public/private hybrids ehrnst Sep 2017 #31
Exactly. Germany has a similar system to the ACA...we would need strong price controls on Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #33
And where did campaigning on a popular idea at the time get the rethugs? LostOne4Ever Sep 2017 #34
They campaigned to get rid of something...they found a common enemy. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #37
K&R Gothmog Sep 2017 #35
A lot of stupid people are still opposed to one big government plan. A Public Option Hoyt Sep 2017 #36
That is a good idea...let people buy into Medicare. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #38
This is playing right into Republican hands CherokeeFiddle Sep 2017 #39
No one is stopping discussion of Single Payer & we should NOT be censoring health policy experts ehrnst Sep 2017 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How single payer helps Re...»Reply #9