Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How single payer helps Republicans change the subject [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)9. That is the name of a specific bill, not the term for the system.
Kaiser Family Foundation is going to use the correct terminology for a system that has had other bills with other names.
And the "Medicare for All" plan differs from Medicare in many ways, so using them interchangeably can lead people to incorrect assumptions about the bill.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/07/medicare-for-all-is-a-misleading-term-for-single-payer.html
For one thing, Medicare is by design an acute care program. It does not cover long-term hospital stays or nursing-home care, and excludes some routine care (e.g., dental and vision care). Presumably a single-payer program designed to replace all or most private insurance would be more comprehensive than Medicare.
And therefore much more expensive and complicated than simply "expanding Medicare."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I know exactly why Sanders chose it. Medicare is popular. That's good marketing. Good politics.
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#27
True. And the "Medicare for All" bill as proposed is different than Medicare as it is.
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#24
Home now...can type better...hubs had last interview today...and they knew he had an offer so
Demsrule86
Sep 2017
#29
Actually, it's a series of regulations that limits and directs the market in many ways
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#23
It could work with some tweaks and it is all we have and if goes it is all we ever had. There is no
Demsrule86
Sep 2017
#30
The vast majority of countries with universal health care have Public/private hybrids
ehrnst
Sep 2017
#31
Exactly. Germany has a similar system to the ACA...we would need strong price controls on
Demsrule86
Sep 2017
#33