General Discussion

StrictlyRockers

(3,933 posts)

41. FB is still a useful platform.

Reply to pnwmom (Reply #40)

Fri Sep 22, 2017, 02:36 PM

Sep 2017

I just prefer Twitter lately. I'm old & I vote, too.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Facebook admits it illegally permitted a foreign country to actively meddle in democratic process [View all] StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 OP

I considered deleting my FB account. forgotmylogin Sep 2017 #1

I unsubscribed this past week. democratisphere Sep 2017 #5

How is that against the law? GusBob Sep 2017 #2

Good question. I wonder if anyone will try to answer. onenote Sep 2017 #12

52 U.S.C. 30121 and 11 CFR 110.20 MrsCoffee Sep 2017 #23

Thank you... Deuce Sep 2017 #25

People like Facebook SHRED Sep 2017 #3

But we all once lived without it. I still do. WinkyDink Sep 2017 #7

I've lived without it for its entire existence. It can be done. Iggo Sep 2017 #28

Like almost all tech companies, Facebook is a defacto monopoly DBoon Sep 2017 #37

"Facebook" is not a human. The word is "Zuckerberg." WinkyDink Sep 2017 #4

+1 dalton99a Sep 2017 #11

Ayup. (n/t) Iggo Sep 2017 #29

The almighty dollar rules the world blueinredohio Sep 2017 #6

They now promise to look into things related to the German election Ezior Sep 2017 #8

Help me with my memory here madokie Sep 2017 #9

That was his co-founder, Eduardo Saverin. n/t demmiblue Sep 2017 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author mythology Sep 2017 #21

Remember the Winklevoss!! HAB911 Sep 2017 #10

Just a month ago, Fuckerberg was hinting at running for Presinut. deminks Sep 2017 #13

I can't wait until we see how Zuckerberg personally approved each ad Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #14

I think buying the ads is all automated with no oversight by humans. StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #15

Oh I know Blue_Adept Sep 2017 #16

Is it significant that they sold $.5 billion in stock to a Russian oligarch? StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #18

Sheryl Sandberg weighs in StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #19

Some of the ads were paid for in rubles. That should have given the computers a clue. nt pnwmom Sep 2017 #34

It is that way by design DBoon Sep 2017 #38

What law was broken? sarisataka Sep 2017 #20

At least 52 U.S.C. 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20 rogue emissary Sep 2017 #22

In my, admitted inexpert, opinion sarisataka Sep 2017 #24

Making any contribution or donation of money or "other thing of value" rogue emissary Sep 2017 #31

As I said, I am far from an expert sarisataka Sep 2017 #33

Some of the illegal campaign ads were paid for in rubles. Facebook should have known. pnwmom Sep 2017 #35

Enabled or permitted Not Ruth Sep 2017 #26

That's it. Lie until you can't lie anymore. Fuck you, Zuckerberg. Iggo Sep 2017 #27

I have deactivated my FB account. JNelson6563 Sep 2017 #30

We have seen no evidence that Russian actors bought ads on Facebook in connection ... DK504 Sep 2017 #32

The problem with leaving FB is that that won't shut it down. I prefer to stay there pnwmom Sep 2017 #36

I agree with this. StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #39

I agree that FB is yesterday. But me and many of my friends ARE yesterday, and we vote pnwmom Sep 2017 #40

FB is still a useful platform. StrictlyRockers Sep 2017 #41

Some people think that Zuckerberg might have to leave the US over this Not Ruth Sep 2017 #42