Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
23. I'm glad she's accepting the legitimacy of issue debate in a primary
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 05:47 PM
Sep 2017

She disagreed with Bernie about firearms policy. Accordingly, she writes, "I hammered him on the issue every chance I got."

Bernie, for his part, disagreed with her about the minimum wage and regulating Wall Street, and hammered her on those issues every chance he got.

I haven't read her book. The impression I've formed is that her hammering Bernie on an issue constitutes thoughtful debate on public policy, entirely appropriate in a contested primary, but Bernie hammering her on an issue constitutes paving the way for Donald Trump.

Perhaps someone who has read the book can address this distinction?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BernieBernieBernieberniebernie shanny Sep 2017 #1
It never ends.. Snackshack Sep 2017 #3
Sad, isn't it? Nt shanny Sep 2017 #4
Pathological Snackshack Sep 2017 #14
I'd like to read his thoughts on the primary. GreenPartyVoter Sep 2017 #6
I would too shanny Sep 2017 #15
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #2
What are you hoping to achieve ? TubbersUK Sep 2017 #5
No problem when books, commentators, and speeches expressed their views on Hillary's "missteps", factfinder_77 Sep 2017 #7
My question wasn't rhetorical n/t TubbersUK Sep 2017 #9
Copyright infringement or a TOS violation for exceeding three paragraphs? TheBlackAdder Sep 2017 #18
HRC was and is wrong on PLCAA. aikoaiko Sep 2017 #8
Ffs, enough with the Hillary vs Bernie already. Brogrizzly Sep 2017 #10
Off to the greatest. raven mad Sep 2017 #11
Flawed premise. thesquanderer Sep 2017 #12
Clinton has been consistently strong against Putin delisen Sep 2017 #13
*yawn* Thanks for reminding me how inane her positions were re the 2nd. X_Digger Sep 2017 #16
JFC! When is this shit going to stop? TheBlackAdder Sep 2017 #17
... Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2017 #19
Thank you for cracking me up this morning! ChubbyStar Sep 2017 #22
This is re-fighting the primaries defined CherokeeFiddle Sep 2017 #20
Same responses to the gun issue as always. Cognitive dissonance is a hell of a thing to witness. kcr Sep 2017 #21
I'm glad she's accepting the legitimacy of issue debate in a primary Jim Lane Sep 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton on guns i...»Reply #23