Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
60. I think you may be confusing me with another poster?
Sun Sep 24, 2017, 05:27 PM
Sep 2017


Seems that those who tell the truth around here about health care policy get flamed.


Johnson maneuvered every step of the way getting this bill through Congress, and one of the things he did — and this is a little dicey in today's climate — was suppress the costs. So this young kid gets elected from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy, in 1962, and Johnson is explaining to him [over the phone] how you get a health bill through. And what he tells him is don't let them get the costs projected too far out because it will scare other people:

"A health program yesterday runs $300 million, but the fools had to go to projecting it down the road five or six years, and when you project it the first year, it runs $900 million. Now I don't know whether I would approve $900 million second year or not. I might approve 450 or 500. But the first thing Dick Russell comes running in saying, 'My God, you've got a billion-dollar program for next year on health, therefore I'm against any of it now.' Do you follow me?"


We believe, after looking at the evidence, my co-author [David Blumenthal] and I, that if the true cost of Medicare had been known — if Johnson hadn't basically hidden them — the program would never have passed. America's second-most beloved program would never have happened, if we had had genuine cost estimates.



http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112234240

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Can't find concrete answers. Have used up my free Nation quota. bettyellen Sep 2017 #1
Transcript - Bernie's speech Mike__M Sep 2017 #9
Thanks! Conceptually it's beautiful. No real answers on Syria... bettyellen Sep 2017 #11
Thats my take on things too. arthritisR_US Sep 2017 #18
I, for one, do not need Bernie Sanders speaking for the Democratic Party. Don't want or need it. tonyt53 Sep 2017 #2
His speech doesn't appear to mention Democrats n/t leftstreet Sep 2017 #3
So when day and time do "Progressives" start their own party and leave the Democratic Party? tonyt53 Sep 2017 #4
I thought the Democratic party embraced progressive ideas leftstreet Sep 2017 #5
Pretty much the same difference, unless you are splitting hairs. tonyt53 Sep 2017 #6
Tony has spoken theaocp Sep 2017 #8
That's the message I got. Loud and clear. (N/T) Old Crow Sep 2017 #14
спасибо товарищу 0rganism Sep 2017 #15
Actually, my response is quite the opposite . tonyt53 Sep 2017 #49
Would that make you happy? Jim Lane Sep 2017 #42
Can you please pay attention to the content. Leave your Bernie hate at the door. tecelote Sep 2017 #16
Churchill is the guy who engaged in a genocide of 2 million brown people by deliberate Ninsianna Sep 2017 #94
Can't have a single positive Bernie thread without someone pissing in the punch bowl. Nt LostOne4Ever Sep 2017 #21
I think he's speaking for the American people. Autumn Sep 2017 #26
Except for those who would like some more details. ehrnst Sep 2017 #46
Many great actions by our leaders started by a spoken vision, not all of them spang forth complete Autumn Sep 2017 #50
I guess if you never question a leader's vision, ehrnst Sep 2017 #51
I remember when Medicare and the ACA were visions but oh well. nt. Autumn Sep 2017 #54
Yeah, and LBJ had to lie about what they cost to get them passed. ehrnst Sep 2017 #55
Oh well I guess you proved LBJ is as bad as any fucking republican. Good on you. Autumn Sep 2017 #56
I think you may be confusing me with another poster? ehrnst Sep 2017 #60
About Obama and the origins of the ACA ehrnst Sep 2017 #62
Are you saying that Obama didn't have a plan all laid out explaining EXACTLY how the ACA was Autumn Sep 2017 #63
Perhaps you should read my post again. This time, move the strawman. ehrnst Sep 2017 #64
I read your article. There was NO exact plan laid out by Obama, yet some expect Bernie to have one . Autumn Sep 2017 #65
You seem to have bought strawmen in bulk - did you find a sale? ehrnst Sep 2017 #67
You seem to be adressing a different post so whatever. Autumn Sep 2017 #68
LOL. I guess you weren't done after all... ehrnst Sep 2017 #69
If there were any truth to your insults it might would sting but your insults are nothing Autumn Sep 2017 #73
And you still can't leave it there.... ehrnst Sep 2017 #74
Nothing to do with "I know you are but what am I? You still proved my point. You can't change that Autumn Sep 2017 #79
He has submitted a bill. ehrnst Sep 2017 #83
LOL Gothmog Sep 2017 #96
You rock! (If you don't mind my saying.) NurseJackie Sep 2017 #103
Nobody here wants universal healthcare for all more than you or I do. Which is WHY Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #75
Rather hot for this time of year. ehrnst Sep 2017 #76
Dont ask, sucks. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #77
Isnt JPR filled with people who delighted in something really bad that happened that I am not Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #66
There are several who post both places. ehrnst Sep 2017 #70
So we will see a repeat of history as I have predicted a few thousand times over the Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #71
But, you know - maybe it just has to "all burn down" ehrnst Sep 2017 #72
Yup +++++++++++++ JHan Sep 2017 #81
I once assumed that would happen because it was forced on us by the GOP Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #82
Our own tea party. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #84
There's Nothing Partyish About It Me. Sep 2017 #95
This message was self-deleted by its author Sluggeaux Sep 2017 #38
Do we move away from endless war and ever rising war budgets? guillaumeb Sep 2017 #7
Renounce the 1.5 trillion F-16 program. Leading by example works for me. bettyellen Sep 2017 #12
One excellent example, and there are others. eom guillaumeb Sep 2017 #17
Any one taking about reducing the military budget has to be honest about their part in it- bettyellen Sep 2017 #20
And THAT concept of pork, and who benefits, guillaumeb Sep 2017 #22
I know. It's really too bad so many Dems voted for the increase in military Nanjeanne Sep 2017 #25
Don't be fooled- some of them already have all the pork their state wants! 1.5 trillion ain't bettyellen Sep 2017 #30
Oh ok. I'll check out Oregon and NY pork. Thanks. Nanjeanne Sep 2017 #33
Ignore the F-16 program with all your might. But it won't go away because VT wants $$$$$ for war too bettyellen Sep 2017 #34
I'm not ignoring. So you need me to argue or agree with you? You have said it Nanjeanne Sep 2017 #35
This may seem petty, and I really don't intend to be confrontational, but you have it wrong The Polack MSgt Sep 2017 #99
No worries. It's just that VT has its war pork same as everyone else, yet they get a pass. bettyellen Sep 2017 #102
Oh, the pork is spead out so all the politicians can get a bite. The Polack MSgt Sep 2017 #104
Not seeing that in the Single Payer bill. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #52
Lowering the war budget is unthinkable for politicians. guillaumeb Sep 2017 #58
Still don't see that in the Single Payer bill. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #59
It is a single issue Bill, not a budget resolution. eom guillaumeb Sep 2017 #78
It would be nice if there were actually discussions about the ideas Nanjeanne Sep 2017 #10
Difficult to deny. guillaumeb Sep 2017 #23
There is real discussion of this speech ehrnst Sep 2017 #80
Saw this earlier. Came to post it but ya beat me to it Arazi Sep 2017 #13
I see a lot of questions, not much "policy". George II Sep 2017 #19
Which questions? Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #37
I've already taken my visit to the aquarium this week, thanks. George II Sep 2017 #39
Huh? Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #41
I hear it's lovely! Lots of clownfish. ehrnst Sep 2017 #87
Yes, they have a bunch of them: George II Sep 2017 #89
Don't hate me JustAnotherGen Sep 2017 #91
Like you say, it's only part of the circle of life - "fish gotta swim, birds gotta fly"......... George II Sep 2017 #92
Many are addressed here, at length ehrnst Sep 2017 #86
Thanks for the Post. nt zentrum Sep 2017 #24
Does he mention the great enemy of the human race and freedom, Putin? Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #27
Yes. Just read the speech. Nanjeanne Sep 2017 #29
Talks about working with Russia to reduce dependence on oil.... bettyellen Sep 2017 #31
Working with Russia? Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #43
To end dependence on oil, lol. It made me wonder if he's paying any attention at all. bettyellen Sep 2017 #45
Isn't the Russian economy dependent on oil and gas exports? comradebillyboy Sep 2017 #53
Or why he and Rand Paul were the only 2 senators to vote against the Russia sanctions? VOX Sep 2017 #40
I know, but nobody even talks about it, like it doesnt matter or didnt happen Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #44
SHHHHHH!!!!!!!! ehrnst Sep 2017 #88
Bernie's foreign policy speech Equinox Moon Sep 2017 #28
Why so insecure? rainin Sep 2017 #32
Thanks for bringing this. K&R nt riderinthestorm Sep 2017 #36
K&R.. disillusioned73 Sep 2017 #47
I thought it lacked A LOT Tavarious Jackson Sep 2017 #48
It's a speech intended to rouse enthusiasm and passion Kentonio Sep 2017 #61
First the good bits: JHan Sep 2017 #85
Great minds... ehrnst Sep 2017 #100
And a former candidate for POTUS could be expected to have some concrete ideas about this ehrnst Sep 2017 #90
Rings a bell DFW Sep 2017 #98
:) Man_Bear_Pig Sep 2017 #57
Sanders is clearly the best statesman alive right now. ananda Sep 2017 #93
Yup! burrowowl Sep 2017 #97
This message was self-deleted by its author heaven05 Sep 2017 #101
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Nation: Bernie Sander...»Reply #60