General Discussion

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)

25. It is in fact,an objective *financial* penalty

Tue Jul 17, 2012, 01:25 PM

Jul 2012

It is in fact,an objective and measurable *financial* penalty, regardless of how one may or may not perceive it as compared or contrasted to other contexts....

Maintaining a sense of context within the overall premise does allow us to better comprehend both what is being written, and the ultimate conclusion of what is being written... without the added penalty of appearing as a sub-literate jack-ass.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The $849,000 Penalty for Being Born Female [View all] TalkingDog Jul 2012 OP

Have you read the sheer nastiness of some of the comments? xmas74 Jul 2012 #1

Those are men's right activist,they're nasty and they're sufrommich Jul 2012 #2

I know they're here. xmas74 Jul 2012 #5

No,they don't. They are so toxic,they're considered sufrommich Jul 2012 #8

And yet are still allowed to post their hate here. xmas74 Jul 2012 #9

One of the usual MRA'ers just showed up. Odin2005 Jul 2012 #22

I put them all on ignore. I'm disappointed that sufrommich Jul 2012 #27

I read a few comments and had to stop. Ilsa Jul 2012 #4

That's the one that killed me. xmas74 Jul 2012 #6

Longer Lifespan? Nederland Jul 2012 #3

It can become one later on xmas74 Jul 2012 #7

Clearly, the benefits of living longer outweigh the penalties of living longer... OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #17

The penalty comes with the COSTS of living longer. Try reading the article please. TalkingDog Jul 2012 #11

That's what I was thinking. xmas74 Jul 2012 #19

So living longer is an inherent disadvantage of being female. Gotcha. EOTE Jul 2012 #21

I did read the article Nederland Jul 2012 #43

It is in fact,an objective *financial* penalty LanternWaste Jul 2012 #25

living longer shouldnt that be seen as a good thing? loli phabay Jul 2012 #35

I'd gladly spend $200k to live another five years taught_me_patience Jul 2012 #10

So you are 85, you can't find a job, you are eating cat food and you can't TalkingDog Jul 2012 #12

Is that what 85 yo women are up to? NCTraveler Jul 2012 #20

I guess they should have spent their husband's life insurance check more wisely. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #34

as opposed to what being dead, i would rather be 85 and struggling rather than in the ground. loli phabay Jul 2012 #36

It costs a lot of money to live a long time! Think of all the money that black people save! lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #37

I'd imagine it's just as hard to take posters seriously LanternWaste Jul 2012 #26

It's both MattBaggins Jul 2012 #28

Beat me to it. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #31

This is the most ridiculous thing I've read this week. Complete gibberish. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #13

Okay, I accept your thesis statement. Now defend it. TalkingDog Jul 2012 #15

I edited to add one example. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #18

Taking time off for family MattBaggins Jul 2012 #30

It is elective time off. Yes. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #33

The irony of this post = LOL Odin2005 Jul 2012 #23

uh what men shouldnt have rights or have i missed something. loli phabay Jul 2012 #38

Ad hominem. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #41

Yeah, well, just...don't do it again. randome Jul 2012 #14

Oh yay! Another gender war thread on DU. FourScore Jul 2012 #16

living longer is a bad thing? Liberal_in_LA Jul 2012 #24

That was my thought. I wonder if inheritances are factored in. Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #29

wow, living longer is a penalty? I stopped reading when i got to that little tidbit. crazyjoe Jul 2012 #32

The rest of it was accurate, but "living longer" is NOT a penalty. Zalatix Jul 2012 #40

I would like to see how many extra hours men have to work as wage slaves... Bonobo Jul 2012 #39

so dumb that it must have been written to crank up the gender war. divide & conquer! HiPointDem Jul 2012 #42