Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We don't have to choose BETWEEN addressing voter suppression or being more progressive on economics. [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)7. No. The point is that we need BOTH, and to be working on both at once.
It's not possible to achieve economic justice if we have to wait to work on that until every single form of social injustice has first been vanquished.
And it's not possible to achieve social justice in isolation from economic justice-market values will always end up working to prevent the end of social injustice, because the system needs some social injustice and some bigotry to keep us all from uniting against it. That is the lesson of the Sixties.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We don't have to choose BETWEEN addressing voter suppression or being more progressive on economics. [View all]
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
OP
"without needing to make any significant changes to what we stand for. "
Weekend Warrior
Sep 2017
#12
I'm not attacking Clinton-we don't need to pretend nothing needs to change to show respect to her.
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#14
It's exactly what you did with this sentence. A sentence that holds no basis in reality.
Weekend Warrior
Sep 2017
#17
I like what we stand for. The Citizen United thing has to be reversed by the SC....
bettyellen
Sep 2017
#13
That's what a lot of the people who keep saying "it was voter suppression" are essentially arguing.
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#6
No. It really isn't. People who point out the existence of voter suppression are
Squinch
Sep 2017
#19
Where The Eff do you get this crap? This is so not a thing. Are you trying to make it a thing? (n/t)
FreepFryer
Sep 2017
#4
What I favor is justice...for those who face injustice(s) and for all who need change from below.
Ken Burch
Sep 2017
#32
Sorry on double post. I think too many equate economic justice with old white repub men
lovemydogs
Sep 2017
#34