Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
32. What I favor is justice...for those who face injustice(s) and for all who need change from below.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 04:11 PM
Sep 2017

The economic justice movement is staunchly against institutional racism and police violence-many of its members have marched with BLM across the country. Many(and this is the movement, not any particular campaign) ARE people of color, LGBTQ people, women.

People thrown out of work by corporate greed are victims of a kind of oppression too...not the same as fear of police violence, not the same as what institutions do to people of color, but oppression in its way as well...sometimes they die...sometimes people who are victims of economic oppression are victims of institutional racism and police violence. too.

The narrative in the primaries was that we had to choose which justice struggle to center-we didn't, they need to be, essentially DUAL centered...and that is the way to proceed.

And contrary to the great misstatement of the primaries, nobody, even the handful who said economic justice should be privileged over social justice-EVER argued that the establishment of economic justice, in and of itself, would wipe out all other forms of injustice. What was said was it needs to happen IF social injustice is to be wiped out. That's an entirely different concept.

My point is that we need to be past that, to admit that our fight should be for justice for the many.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We should stop ignoring it when talking about "What Happened" bettyellen Sep 2017 #1
I don't know of anybody on the Left who IS ignoring it. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #5
"without needing to make any significant changes to what we stand for. " Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #12
I'm not attacking Clinton-we don't need to pretend nothing needs to change to show respect to her. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #14
It's exactly what you did with this sentence. A sentence that holds no basis in reality. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #17
Not back away from...improve, add to a bit. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #18
Just what the Fuck does that mean? GulfCoast66 Sep 2017 #35
Don't talk to me like I'm NOT a Dem. I liked most of the platform. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #36
My response was a little caustic and I apologize GulfCoast66 Sep 2017 #37
Thank you for that. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #38
I like what we stand for. The Citizen United thing has to be reversed by the SC.... bettyellen Sep 2017 #13
Another classic. Who EVER said we need to choose between those two, Ken? Squinch Sep 2017 #2
That's what a lot of the people who keep saying "it was voter suppression" are essentially arguing. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #6
No. It really isn't. People who point out the existence of voter suppression are Squinch Sep 2017 #19
Everybody on the Left AGREES that there is voter suppression, though. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #24
No one has ever said we need to choose between fighting voter suppression and Squinch Sep 2017 #25
OK...then why, on virtually every occasion... Ken Burch Sep 2017 #30
I'm struggling to imagine a society that Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #3
No. The point is that we need BOTH, and to be working on both at once. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #7
That was my point. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #9
That's been my point the whole time...prior to 2016 Ken Burch Sep 2017 #15
Unless you are being shot 6 times for jaywalking. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #26
It remains inseparable from economic justice. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #27
I tried, never mind. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #28
Yes you tried and failed. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #29
We all agree that that is top of the priority list. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #31
Only one group has stated one can happen without the other. nt. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #11
Where The Eff do you get this crap? This is so not a thing. Are you trying to make it a thing? (n/t) FreepFryer Sep 2017 #4
Wait a minute!!!!!!!!!!!! guillaumeb Sep 2017 #8
Nope. That's nothing like what he's saying. Squinch Sep 2017 #20
It is what Burch is saying applied to a specific issue. eom guillaumeb Sep 2017 #22
Why is the choice between those two. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #10
That's the opposite of what I'm saying Ken Burch Sep 2017 #16
But it obviously has not been accepted. guillaumeb Sep 2017 #21
Then your words are extremely unclear. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #23
What I favor is justice...for those who face injustice(s) and for all who need change from below. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #32
Thank you! I've been saying the same for awhile now! lovemydogs Sep 2017 #33
Sorry on double post. I think too many equate economic justice with old white repub men lovemydogs Sep 2017 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We don't have to choose B...»Reply #32