Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JoeStuckInOH

(544 posts)
40. His style of QB is atypical to that of a great majority of teams.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 07:07 PM
Sep 2017

He's much more of a Russell Wilson / Michael Vick style QB than the typical "Pro-Style" (pocket) QBs on many other teams (The Mannings, Brady's, Roethlisbergers, etc...).

Of the 2-3 teams that can currently utilize a QB like Colin Kaepernick with a play style like his WITHOUT retooling their offensive schemes and playbooks; they all already have skilled starting QBs. And Kaepernick (understandably) does not want to take the serious paycut to be one of these teams 2nd or 3rd QB. Within his skillset, he's a very good quarterback and I'm sure he wants compensated as such. The problem is that there's no one looking to buy that style of (middle-aged) QB for what he's asking. He's between a rock and a hard place... but for the right price, he'd have a contract tomorrow.

Yes, he's better (much better) than a good number of quarterbacks currently employed in the NFL. But those other QBs are on teams that have them because they fit into the play style of the existing offense. Modern football players are extremely specialized. It would be a poor decision to select a starting or second string QB that has a different skillset and requires different offensive strategy between the first and second string QB. If there were an injury midgame, which is the entire premise of backup QBs, you'd have to change the strategy you practiced for a whole week prior. It'd be a disaster.

So for Kaepernick to go to one of these 26+ teams, He'd have to again take a pay cut to be a second/third stringer while he retools his skillset. All the while, the team he went to is "gambling" that Kaepernick can make the transition... when they could alternatively be putting those resources into younger prospects that cost less $ and have longer term future outlooks.

I'd say it's about 70/30 (technical/political) that he is not on a team right now.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obligating players to stand during the anthem? Fuck that. stopbush Sep 2017 #1
The NFL. as the employer, is trying to not alienate its customers louis c Sep 2017 #4
And perhaps UAW workers should be required to stand and say the pledge stopbush Sep 2017 #8
One I ignored; the second, nope. The POSSESSIVE FORM of "IT" HAS NO APOSTROPHE. It's "ITS." WinkyDink Sep 2017 #11
Personally I think we all should take a knee madokie Sep 2017 #12
That's fine louis c Sep 2017 #14
Half their customers? BannonsLiver Sep 2017 #19
Their customers are still going to games louis c Sep 2017 #22
That some fans are pissed isn't in dispute. BannonsLiver Sep 2017 #29
I'm looking for a way to convince bigots their wrong louis c Sep 2017 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author happy feet Sep 2017 #15
Does not even address the issue of police brutality against blacks.. HipChick Sep 2017 #2
That's what the PS spots and the $100 Million are for louis c Sep 2017 #5
I like it. It's eminently sensible, and addresses all of the current disagreements equitably. Aristus Sep 2017 #3
I propose one thing.. pangaia Sep 2017 #6
This protest is not against war, but social injustice louis c Sep 2017 #7
Yes, you are right. Absolutely. I didn't mean to imply it wasn't. pangaia Sep 2017 #25
As a negotiator, I think you can appreciate and work with my response. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #9
Well, we have an employee who is a victim of the dispute, and he must be made "whole" louis c Sep 2017 #13
I am not convinced he is a victim when it comes to employment. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #16
I agree with you, I'm not sure, either louis c Sep 2017 #17
I just finished watching the video. I enjoyed it. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #20
I love my job louis c Sep 2017 #23
Why doesn't the NFL do all that anyway? pangaia Sep 2017 #10
Just change our National Anthem to "The Liberty Bell" by J.P. Sousa Doc_Technical Sep 2017 #18
Oh, wonderful. From a Sousa march lover and sometimes player... pangaia Sep 2017 #26
Sounds great to me to change it Rorey Sep 2017 #28
Not sure why the NFL would agree to this NobodyHere Sep 2017 #21
You're right. But that doesn't make it right. Rorey Sep 2017 #30
Oh hell no. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #24
Bless you for being a union rep, you are doing god's work, sure I am an atheist but it sounds good Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #27
That song will hit the bigots who try to act like patriots louis c Sep 2017 #32
IMO, The NFL's best course of action, as a corporation, is to just ride this out. JoeStuckInOH Sep 2017 #31
I heard the same reasoning about Mohamad Ali louis c Sep 2017 #33
Huh? There is very little comparison. Nobody is villifying colin kaepernick. JoeStuckInOH Sep 2017 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author JonLP24 Sep 2017 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author JonLP24 Sep 2017 #35
Maybe Kap's girlfriend shouldn't have insulted Baltimore's owner NobodyHere Sep 2017 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author JonLP24 Sep 2017 #39
His style of QB is atypical to that of a great majority of teams. JoeStuckInOH Sep 2017 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author JonLP24 Sep 2017 #41
Settle what? There's no dispute; players are protesting - AS THEY SHOULD! - & the owners InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #42
That was last week louis c Sep 2017 #43
tRump is already getting embarrassed... and the more players and owners who participate InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My Suggestion on Settling...»Reply #40