Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, we have to ask: Was Stephen Paddock a terrorist? [View all]Glassunion
(10,201 posts)48. Because generally that would not make national news...
No offense to the great state of Florida but, usually the stories that you are looking for tend to come out of Florida. It is usually a local headline that starts with "Florida Man", which then is followed with something that would put Florida Man's sanity into question.
Examples (true):
Florida Man robs bank with spatula.
Florida man threatens youths with air rifle, claims he "runs this street"
To get a seat, Florida Man threatens Red Lobster: 'I work for the Taliban, and I have a bomb in this bag'
Florida Man assaulted with poultry
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Terrorism typically implies some sort of agenda--political, religious, racial, etc
Tommy_Carcetti
Oct 2017
#8
Sure. But if I wanted to enhance my chances, I certainly wouldn't wear a burka. :)
Hortensis
Oct 2017
#79
There's also a Nevada LEGAL definition of terrorism that seems to apply to Paddock:
pnwmom
Oct 2017
#71
Since federal law rules in this case, and the FBI is in charge, it's not okay to ignore it
Hortensis
Oct 2017
#74
Why couldn't he have been prosecuted under Nevada law, if he had survived? That's where the murders
pnwmom
Oct 2017
#90
What is malicious and divisive about this? Why do we usually only use the word terrorism
pnwmom
Oct 2017
#94
Nevada law is not the "outlier" in Nevada, and that's where the murders occurred.
pnwmom
Oct 2017
#102
There was quite the disconnect this morning with the media saying, "lone wolf gunman" & "police are
FSogol
Oct 2017
#16
I still have the family Nat Geo subscription from when we had moved in 1968
BumRushDaShow
Oct 2017
#116
There were 2 women who had attended who were interviewed on a local LV station
BumRushDaShow
Oct 2017
#33
Nevada state law doesn't require a political intent. A massive loss of life would be enough.
pnwmom
Oct 2017
#68
One does need to exercise caution however, if that term carries a legal definition or penalties.
Glassunion
Oct 2017
#50
Maybe not a political "terrorist," but photos of the victims indicate they were terrified.
Hoyt
Oct 2017
#24
They have used anti-terrorism laws to prosecute organized crime and drug cartels
IronLionZion
Oct 2017
#45
I've never heard of a disgruntled employee shooter described as a "terrorist" before.
MrScorpio
Oct 2017
#57
So the far left wants to call white mass shooters terrorists, and the far right wants to call black
snooper2
Oct 2017
#60
Yes, he was. Until we confront home grown terrorism head on, this will keep happening...
Hekate
Oct 2017
#62
I'm a lifelong supporter of Planned Parenthood. Eric Rudolph is a terrorist, as are others.
Hekate
Oct 2017
#81
All I can see in mind's eye is some fucker standing ankle deep in shell casings.
GreenEyedLefty
Oct 2017
#112