Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A device designed to kill massive amounts of humans in very short time is called ... [View all]Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)17. If you want to use something as an argument, it is on you to provide a link.
Something like this:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Girandoni_air_rifle
The rifle was 4 ft (1.2 m) long and weighed 10 lb (4.5 kg), about the same basic size and weight as other muskets of the time. It fired a .46 caliber ball [3] (caliber is contested, original sources such as Dolleczek [4] describe the caliber as 13mm (.51cal)) and it had a tubular, gravity-fed magazine with a capacity of 20 balls. This gravity operated design was such that the rifle had to be pointed upwards in order to drop each ball into the breech block. Unlike its contemporary, muzzle-loading muskets, which required the rifleman to stand up to reload with powder and ball, the shooter could reload a ball from the magazine by holding the rifle vertically while lying on his back and operating the ball delivery mechanism. The rifleman then could roll back into position to fire, allowing the rifleman to keep a "low profile".
Regardless of anything else, it is clearly not a semi-automatic, which fires with each trigger pull. A semi-automatic requires nothing other than a trigger pull to fire subsequent rounds. The authors of the Bill of Rights did not know of any weapons that could fire with just another trigger pull.
If you were talking about :
You defeat your own argument. The rifle has to be vertical to reload. Clearly, the design goes along with the concepts of the day, that muzzle loading guns need to be vertical to reload. They could. with a simple design change, allow the weapon to be reloaded without pointing it to the sky, but the concept DID NOT exist at the time. The authors of the Bill of Rights knew nothing of semi-automatic weapons.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A device designed to kill massive amounts of humans in very short time is called ... [View all]
uponit7771
Oct 2017
OP
Shameless kick and point that Maddow is reporting its 20 weapons now that was in his hotel room
uponit7771
Oct 2017
#1
Actually, no, it was gravity fed from a magazine. You did have to turn it to the side at least.
X_Digger
Oct 2017
#8
You forgot the Kalthoff repeater theoretically the best of them all, but never in production...
TreasonousBastard
Oct 2017
#6
The technology was widely understood. It's asinine to suppose the founders were ignorant..
X_Digger
Oct 2017
#35
because the NRA, a non-profit terrorist organization, owns the republican party.
spanone
Oct 2017
#18
We know why white wingers are OK with gunz. Maybe you should ask our own gun support group how
Hoyt
Oct 2017
#26