Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Making the perfect the enemy of the good." [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)80. I wasn't saying you were actually saying anybody was advocating for a coup. I was saying
I don't know what brute force you are talking about, so of course I'm also advocating for change within the system, not from without. I don't think that qualifies as a straw-man. I did get the impression(because I've heard it before, but maybe not from you) that you were suggesting that people on the left were trying to strong-arm people into submission. Even thinking you meant that, my coup statement was just to suggest that such an argument isn't legitimate because the left has to get the people behind their message to get any change to happen and are hardly advocating brute force as a solution to pushing an agenda.
But it looks like I did misunderstand your point. yes, we have to work within the system. Yes, we have no choice but to compromise. There is still a difference between compromising on the final plan and compromising on the ideal. Campaign on the good stuff. Get the compromise. Don't campaign on the compromise and get nothing.
And as you've stated, and I totally agree with, the GOP is getting huge pressure from their donors to bring home some big fucking wins. Worse, most of them have such gerrymandered districts and are reaping such huge dividends from voter suppression, that they don't fear the people at all. They are not, nor do they need to be, in a compromising state of mind. We cannot work with them.
Which is why we should be finding common causes that slap their constituents in the face with prizes so glowy that even they wake the fuck up and either shift their allegiences or pressure their legislators to start compromising.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obviously, it is wrong to say that there's NO difference between the two parties
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#13
Not about her-about the way that phrase"don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good"-
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#17
Because every decision, every piece of legislation has a numerical metric of over or under 50%
ehrnst
Oct 2017
#59
That phrase "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" goes back to the Nineties
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#21
"Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater" goes back even farther than the '90's
ehrnst
Oct 2017
#23
I know it goes back to Voltaire, but it became a party maxim in the Nineties.
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#29
I think you might be very disappointed to learn about the Civil Rights act of 1964
ehrnst
Oct 2017
#65
It was a different time. But for a lot of us, it's a big thing to want to be sure...
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#106
Well, I do agree Dems could have done much better to sell H/C legislation to the public..
JHan
Oct 2017
#113
"Tearing allies down gives ammo to their opponents..." Yes indeed. I'd also add...
NurseJackie
Oct 2017
#114
For a refreshing change, why not blame Republicans for Republican-majority legislation
betsuni
Oct 2017
#52
There are few if any situations where Democratic presidents HAVE to sign Republican legislation.
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#55
Sorry Ken, your misinterpretation of HRC's point/words seems like a real stretch to me.
emulatorloo
Oct 2017
#70
I did say I agree fully with what she says in the last line quoted in the OP.
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#93
One counterarguemnt for your citation is the ACA, or "Obamacare" as it is framed.
guillaumeb
Oct 2017
#40
And the motivation, the root of THAT particular backlash was open racism. eom
guillaumeb
Oct 2017
#43
yes exactly. It was a a respectable strategy. Now we know it doesn't work. We know there is no
JCanete
Oct 2017
#48
ACA is not 'the same' as Heritage. "The Heritage Plan *Was* The Conservative Alternate to the ACA"
emulatorloo
Oct 2017
#69
Nobody on the left is actually against fixing K-12. It's just that by itself, that isn't enough.
Ken Burch
Oct 2017
#86
You believe a lack of college education renders secondary and primary education irrelevant?
LanternWaste
Oct 2017
#87
Of course the quote is accurate. Your "spin" is a logical leap you've made that is not
emulatorloo
Oct 2017
#103
It should be acknowledged though, that there is a distinction between compromising
JCanete
Oct 2017
#47
Interesting, thanks. That is absolutely a distinction. I'd assumed it was worse than Obamacare, but
JCanete
Oct 2017
#71
Yep, even I forgot . There's enough misinformation about the ACA out there already
JHan
Oct 2017
#76
I certainly don't always know. Sometimes I'm wrong. I'm not interested in going to the grave being
JCanete
Oct 2017
#78