Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Break time

(195 posts)
45. Most high powered
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 03:12 PM
Oct 2017

Rifles will penetrate body armor, a knife will penetrate body armor and an arrow will go through like a hot knife through butter...

a couple of classes will actually stop high powered rifles and even armor piercing rounds
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type III (Rifles). This armor protects against 7.62mm full metal jacketed (FMJ) bullets (U.S. military designation M80), with nominal masses of 9.6 g (148 gr), impacting at a minimum velocity of 838 m/s (2750 ft/s) or less. It also provides protection against Type I through III-A threats. Type III body armor is clearly intended only for tactical situations when the threat warrants such protection, such as barricade confrontations involving sporting rifles.

Type IV (Armor Piercing Rifle). This armor protects against .30 caliber armor piercing (AP) bullets (U.S. military designation M2 AP), with nominal masses of 10.8 g (166 gr), impacting at a minimum velocity of 869 m/s (2850 ft/s) or less. It also provides at least single-hit protection against the Type I through III threats. Type IV body armor provides the highest level of protection currently available. Because this armor is intended to resist "armor piercing" bullets, it often uses ceramic materials. Such materials are brittle in nature and may provide only single-shot protection, since the ceramic tends to break up when struck. As with Type III armor, Type IV armor is clearly intended only for tactical situations when the threat warrants such protection.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, and now Soxfan58 Oct 2017 #1
They can wear earplugs. Period. octoberlib Oct 2017 #2
Ha! Ha! That is the most stupid B.S. excuse I have ever heard. UCmeNdc Oct 2017 #3
You could wear a bullet-proof vest. aikoaiko Oct 2017 #4
Perhaps a suit of armor? To protect my head and limb arteries? nt phylny Oct 2017 #31
Maybe, but what a burden for you. aikoaiko Oct 2017 #36
True. I wouldn't want my body to get in the way of someone's need to have enough guns to kill phylny Oct 2017 #37
Regardless of the 2nd, it would have no bearing on a damn silencer. 7962 Oct 2017 #5
Actually under the law they are defined as "firearms" Lee-Lee Oct 2017 #6
there is no constitutional barrier to regulating silencers, which is why congress Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #7
And.....no constitutional barrier to regulating Airplanes either..... ashredux Oct 2017 #8
well no shit, that was my point. Voltaire2 Oct 2017 #9
But we have no "right" to own an airplane. 7962 Oct 2017 #46
It's like motorcycles being so loud to protect the drivers' safety Orrex Oct 2017 #10
The two things are unconnected. Adrahil Oct 2017 #11
Wrong. The two are indeed connected. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #21
I've gone into this before... Adrahil Oct 2017 #24
Do you use your gun to commit mass shootings? kcr Oct 2017 #30
Then what point are you arguing? I'm missing it. NT Adrahil Oct 2017 #32
Yes, it's obvious you're missing it. kcr Oct 2017 #33
I'm trying to have a reasonable conversation with you. Adrahil Oct 2017 #34
I'll snark all I want. It's my defense mechanism against ridiculous arguments kcr Oct 2017 #35
Oh for fuck's sake. Adrahil Oct 2017 #39
Wrong. From your own article: SunSeeker Oct 2017 #42
But I thought they were "Silent?" Adrahil Oct 2017 #43
I never said they were "Silent." SunSeeker Oct 2017 #44
Get better ear muffs. Or a better hobby. Fishing is very quiet. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #41
Then they can rent them from range stillsoleft Oct 2017 #12
Pardon my naivity... paleotn Oct 2017 #13
Subsonic (silenced) bullets have no use in target practice. gordianot Oct 2017 #14
I do own some subsonic .22LR rounds. Adrahil Oct 2017 #25
Is concern about 3.5 million Americans in bad trouble being silenced? Hortensis Oct 2017 #15
Single payer and silencers are legal in France Not Ruth Oct 2017 #16
Why should anybody be able to buy armor piercing bullets? You'd think cops would be raising octoberlib Oct 2017 #17
Did you actually look at the proposed legislation? hack89 Oct 2017 #18
Here's the section! atreides1 Oct 2017 #19
I guess that is my point. hack89 Oct 2017 #20
This is a result of.... Adrahil Oct 2017 #26
Here is what that is Lee-Lee Oct 2017 #40
Because every deer rifle uses bullets that can penetrate armor? NickB79 Oct 2017 #23
Most high powered Break time Oct 2017 #45
They need silencers to make them more efficient killers - avebury Oct 2017 #22
If Congress drops more regs relating to silencers, shooters & poachers will be impossible to "hear" Sunlei Oct 2017 #27
Nobody needs a silencer for a firearm. MineralMan Oct 2017 #28
I'd agree it's about wants, but... Adrahil Oct 2017 #38
Now now. You wouldn't want people to go deaf when they're getting shot at. tenderfoot Oct 2017 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So help me understand thi...»Reply #45