Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gtar100

(4,192 posts)

12. Oh the extremes we must go to to explain the obvious to republicans.

Reply to PearliePoo2 (Original post)

Tue Oct 3, 2017, 03:44 PM

Oct 2017

How would they feel if the gerrymandering were in favor of Democrats. It's ridiculous we have to go all the way to the Supreme Court just to make precinct lines represent actual neighborhoods and common areas. The shit they've pulled is blatantly obvious.

It's unfortunate their desire for power doesn't embrace having good ideas that actually help as many people as possible in their constituency. They are the party of the ultra rich and the ultra rich have proven over and over again they care for no one but themselves (seeing how they are willing to throw the whole world into the garbage to keep taking money they don't need but billions of other people do).

So republicans have to resort to deception to peddle their bullshit. And we have to go to court to attempt to get them to stop cheating. Normal people, good people don't need to be forced to work out fair rules we can all live with.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maybe just maybe, a glimmer of hope and possibly GOOD news? This of course, is huge! [View all] PearliePoo2 Oct 2017 OP

There is hope. If Gerrymandering in Wi. goes down. lovemydogs Oct 2017 #1

It won't take down Walker, but it possible Ryan would be gone, Greybnk48 Oct 2017 #10

Ugghhh. Here's from Ari Berman's Twitter on what C.J. Roberts said: PearliePoo2 Oct 2017 #2

Those words sound corrupt. Let's hope he has concern for a respectable legacy. Hortensis Oct 2017 #6

just to keep some perspective here, unblock Oct 2017 #3

I thought that this was a litmus test and would set a precedent BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #8

if they actually decide something, it may well set a precedent. unblock Oct 2017 #14

You're right. They always seem to find a sneaky way BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #16

The hope is that more states adopt a non-partisan group BumRushDaShow Oct 2017 #9

that sounds like a good idea, but i would think that needs to be legislated unblock Oct 2017 #15

Yup but it is an option that should be pushed regardless of how the courts rule. BumRushDaShow Oct 2017 #19

Look at what Ohio did to District 6 Marthe48 Oct 2017 #18

Wanna see something worse? Check out PA-7 BumRushDaShow Oct 2017 #20

State of PA is listed 3rd in the 2nd link I posted Marthe48 Oct 2017 #22

Thanks for something good. This SCOTUS case is so big, I feel a bit ill Hortensis Oct 2017 #4

Oh God....I am on pins and needles here jodymarie aimee Oct 2017 #5

Here's a link to SCOTUSblog. Amy Howe writes a good analysis of today. PearliePoo2 Oct 2017 #7

"But there was no apparent agreement about whether courts could or should get involved" BumRushDaShow Oct 2017 #11

Oh the extremes we must go to to explain the obvious to republicans. gtar100 Oct 2017 #12

This is the last, best hope for the Christian* Republic of Scott Walkerstan to revert back Still In Wisconsin Oct 2017 #13

It will be a fatal body blow to the State if we lose. Greybnk48 Oct 2017 #23

It really will. If the SC rules in favor of Walker on this one, Still In Wisconsin Oct 2017 #24

That's been the standard for a while... Baconator Oct 2017 #17

Worst gerrymandering from Buzzfeed (2013) and Rant (2017) Marthe48 Oct 2017 #21

Very scary that just one Justice could change the course of this....... a kennedy Oct 2017 #25