Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Selatius

(20,441 posts)
25. The elites in the state were largely Democratic until the 1960s/1970s realignment.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 05:00 AM
Jul 2012

The New Deal Coalition pretty much began splintering apart after the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the the movement for more social freedoms as well as the anti-war movement against Viet Nam. All of these essentially meant the base of voters that gave rise to the New Deal Democrats had split apart along socially liberal and socially conservative lines and along racial lines, and the lines exist to this day.

Since the split, the divide has seemingly become entrenched. Propaganda after the Fairness Doctrine was removed only helped cement those in the working class who vote for Republicans into place with the idea that minorities are out to take away their country and their jobs. In reality, they have more in common with poor blacks and poor hispanics than they do with the wealthy 1%, but good propaganda has shown time and time again that people can be made to do the bidding of the elites.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What happened to Texas? It was largely Democratic until after the 1970's Fla Dem Jul 2012 #1
What caused it? Outright stupidity coupled with boatloads of fraud and more than a smattering of... truebrit71 Jul 2012 #2
Bush and Rove .. ananda Jul 2012 #3
Tom Delay.....Dick Armey.....ad nauseum.. lastlib Jul 2012 #10
Poor leadership at the state level Gman Jul 2012 #4
That's also true. ananda Jul 2012 #5
If you want to go way back Gman Jul 2012 #30
Reagan's "Southern strategy" Fozzledick Jul 2012 #8
Nixon's, actually WilliamPitt Jul 2012 #15
Nixon started it, Reagan cemented it and hopefully Obama kicks the fucker down. Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #26
Republican congress messing with the districts (gerrymandering). Avalux Jul 2012 #19
Hot Tub Tommy and his Gerrymandering. chalky Jul 2012 #20
The elites in the state were largely Democratic until the 1960s/1970s realignment. Selatius Jul 2012 #25
Same thing that happened to most southern states... Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #27
Ride 'me podna flamingdem Jul 2012 #6
I think it could have been 2008 if he had picked Richardson as VP Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #7
So many people from the West Coast moved, there, too. (and the cowboy hat? so cute!) n/t progressivebydesign Jul 2012 #9
Thirty years ago the GOP developed a strategy and it paid off "Big Time" Bandit Jul 2012 #11
Obama rawwwwks that cowboy hat Skittles Jul 2012 #12
Hehehehe Iliyah Jul 2012 #13
Here's the VIDEO and a related article Tx4obama Jul 2012 #23
He was just giving the GOP a taste of what to expect in 2016: swing state Texas bluestateguy Jul 2012 #14
I'm not sure I want to be a member of any party that would ever again nom the likes of either. Chan790 Jul 2012 #22
Texas USED TO BE Democratic not too long ago. Remember Gov. Ann Richards? Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #16
Locally, Democrats had more weight. Nationally? No way. Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #28
To be fair, states usu. vote for hometown boys (3 Bush elections). Reagan won almost the whole Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #31
Obama is right, that's why the GOP sent the Gerimandaring(sp) to the USSC who ruled in their uponit7771 Jul 2012 #17
San Antonio area will go blue; was 4 years ago. Avalux Jul 2012 #18
It was the Reagan revolution that started it Ishoutandscream2 Jul 2012 #21
In 2008 over 3.5 MILLION Texans voted for Obama. I think there will be even more in 2012. Tx4obama Jul 2012 #24
I hope the democrats have strong presidential candidates lovemydog Jul 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Terror Grips the GOP As O...»Reply #25