Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A day in the life of the self made man. [View all]Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)100. I checked your edit and the video came up for me. (edit)
I'm not sure to what speech you were looking for so I got nothin' on that.
As you might imagine, I don't play well with those types portrayed in the video. Well, actually, I don't much associate with type of person if I have an option.
I prefer the original meaning of 'compete' rather than its later version(s).
1610s, from M.Fr. compéter "be in rivalry with" (14c.), or directly from L.L. competere "strive in common," in classical Latin "to come together, agree, to be qualified," later, "strive together," from com- "together" (see com-) + petere "to strive, seek, fall upon, rush at, attack" (see petition). Rare 17c., and regarded early 19c. as a Scottish or Amer.Eng. word. Market sense is from 1840s (perhaps a back formation from competition); athletics sense attested by 1857. Related: Competed; competing. link
And FYI, L.L. Late Latin, the literary Latin language as spoken and written c.300-c.700.
edit: Thanks for the quote. And the video. As you might imagine, those things aren't the things I want for my definition of success. I'm a very weird person in this "dog eat dog" world.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
157 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I always tell people to look inside, up and around. Media and RW talk tell us to admire the UP,
freshwest
Jul 2012
#31
And exactly what are we entitled to since none of us produced much of what we own directly?
dkf
Jul 2012
#5
I know 1 person scamming the system and whole lot more who aren't. You want to sacrifice all for
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#121
Biggest scammers by far are corporate/govt cronies like Blackwater, Haliburton and hundreds of other
ErikJ
Jul 2012
#46
If they're in foreclosure and not paying condo fees for years, why haven't they been evicted?
Hippo_Tron
Jul 2012
#42
If people are living in your condo and not paying the fees, you and others in the condo
JDPriestly
Jul 2012
#65
Bully for you for owning a condo. Too bad you didn't pay any attention at all
kestrel91316
Jul 2012
#77
Then foreclose on the bank or whomever holds title. The assoc. lien will be superior.
Hassin Bin Sober
Jul 2012
#129
I'm sure you sincerely believe that some of your neighbors are gaming the system,
Flatulo
Jul 2012
#80
Everyone on social security, everyone getting vets benefits are "pathological liars", don't want to
uppityperson
Jul 2012
#125
Yeah, who needs women anyway? They're just annoying and they always need something.
calimary
Jul 2012
#26
I get it. Success is not possible without some degree of government involvement.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#43
Ya know - I'm not sure Hillary was talking about becoming successful in business.
cherokeeprogressive
Jul 2012
#47
Opportunity is what seperates those who make it, and those who don't. I know.
JoePhilly
Jul 2012
#104
Individualism fails because families/communities are the building blocks of society, not individuals
reformist2
Jul 2012
#69
OK, so what has this guy contributed to society that he will be allowed to live
Blue Meany
Jul 2012
#114
"Self made doesn't require that every last detail was done solely by oneself."
Cerridwen
Jul 2012
#130