Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: JPR Nutjobs interpret CA moving up their primary as an attack on Sanders chances in 2020 [View all]delisen
(7,377 posts)69. So bored with the "too old" otherizing
Is it possible for human societies to exist without creating out groups?
"Us good, them bad." "We have rights, they don't." Seems like such a primitive method of group binding.
I want to live in a democracy where people are seen as individuals, not just as members of a cohort, but as persons with the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
I know many people in their 80s whom I consider fit to run and carry out the duties of the presidency. I know many people in their 40s whom I consider unfit to run and to carry out the duties of the presidency.
It is a four year office, not a kingship or an empire position.
Should we go against our centuries old trend and start passing legislation narrowing the pool from which we draw candidates in a democracy? Talk about moving backwards.
Authoritarianism is on the rise worldwide, and it will influence what we do and how we think- but that authoritarianism, is for the most part to be resisted
Sanders and Clinton were not "pushing" anything in 2016 by being of their respective ages.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
144 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
JPR Nutjobs interpret CA moving up their primary as an attack on Sanders chances in 2020 [View all]
stevenleser
Oct 2017
OP
The people and posts at JPR deserve the same (lack of) respect as the people and posts at FR.
LonePirate
Oct 2017
#1
Agreed. The only reason they deserve mention at all is that they are part of DU history AND
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#2
What's Sanders going to do, run as a 3rd party candidate? He has zero chance running as a Dem again.
brush
Oct 2017
#33
I am not a Bernie fan at all, but I wouldn't say he has zero chance. But the JPR types dont
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#35
They can advance their self-deceptive interests all they want but the Democratic Party...
brush
Oct 2017
#37
DNC bylaws should be amended so that delegates can not vote for or be claimed by someone
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#55
It is not unreasonable for someone standing on behalf of the Democratic Party, to reflect the ideals
OnDoutside
Oct 2017
#112
I have more respect for the scummy posters at FR. At least they aren't pretending to be Democrats.
FSogol
Oct 2017
#18
Does this mean they support Nancy Pelosi now and dont think she is too old?
Eliot Rosewater
Oct 2017
#5
He would still lose. He has angered many Democrats of late with some unwise comments .
Demsrule86
Oct 2017
#136
no, the "jpr nutjobs" posted a video by somebody called "the humanist report" who interprets this.
m-lekktor
Oct 2017
#14
5 recs and two comments both agreeing. And I remember Segami who is the poster, he agrees.
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#15
JPR is full of Stein and stay home kind of voters who helped elect Donald Trump.
Demsrule86
Oct 2017
#135
And a bunch of nut jobs agree with the poster, including some who vow not to vote for a Democrat.n/t
pnwmom
Oct 2017
#17
Sorry, we can all read the JPR thread, so you can't just make up stuff about it
emulatorloo
Oct 2017
#107
Their main issue with her is that she isnt Bernie. Anyone who looms as a challenge to
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#34
It's a definite lolsob that that they now want to anoint Bernie Sanders for 2020
KitSileya
Oct 2017
#54
They are all over the place because they are defined by nationalistic like or hate of people and
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#27
Attacking people for present tense actions has nothing to do with whether we have moved on
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#58
Sanders and hatred of the DNC is everything for these folks. Everything has to be about
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#36
He's not going to run as a Democrat again. Not after trashing Dem's constantly, can't fool us again.
Lil Missy
Oct 2017
#66
Now you are just disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing and I can prove it.
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#89
By all means, cite empirical studies about the ability of the elderly to work 80 hour weeks
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#97
Average life expectancy and statistics of common health problems at certain ages are pretty solid.
phleshdef
Oct 2017
#126
I don't...you have to consider electability. And I just don't think an 80 year old candidate is
Demsrule86
Oct 2017
#139
I dont need to reread it, I wrote it. And I know exactly what is implied by the JPR post
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#91
We can all read this thread, so you can't just make up stuff about it and get a free pass
emulatorloo
Oct 2017
#96
Yep. And when that persons misdirection failed, they made a not so veiled threat against me
stevenleser
Oct 2017
#98
The JPR people were doomed to disappointment...because if Sen. Sanders runs,
Demsrule86
Oct 2017
#134