Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Water Engine [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)43. There is no US patent issued in 1990 which is in force today
Patents used to have terms of 17 years. As a transitional measure to the current 20 years-from-filing term, patents issued prior to the last revision are entitled to the greater of the two terms.
Hence, any argument that anything patented in the mid 1990's is being "suppressed" will be thoroughly irrelevant within two or three years from now.
There simply is no way to use patents to permanently block the commercialization of anything.
And, as amusing as you may have found Borat, there are significant economies outside of the US.
(a minor exception are certain pharmaceutical patents which can be extended in view of regulatory delay to market)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The problem with the air engine is it runs on carbon monoxide extracted from the air.
rug
Jul 2012
#13
Most "believers" do not think too deeply. Many people do not have critical thinking skills. n-t
Logical
Jul 2012
#2
"Third, a conspiracy to suppress knowledge of something everyone in the world wants is an absurdity"
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#16
The knowledge may not be suppressed, but the application certainly is. nt
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#35
"Bullshit" suggests that you have some reason to disbelieve what I said.
lumberjack_jeff
Jul 2012
#37