Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cyclonefence

(5,167 posts)
Mon Oct 9, 2017, 09:00 AM Oct 2017

Jerry Lee Lewis redux [View all]

Here we go again with the age-old question of the unfit priest. Is the money Harvey Weinstein donated *to a good cause* tainted because he is a dreadful human being?

The notion of accepting money from a known sexual predator is revolting, and had his history of abusing women been known before Democrats accepted his financial support, of course his donations should have been refused.

But the money was accepted in all innocence--afaik, no one in our party was privy to his secret life--and therefore I don't think we ought to be returning it.

Can an evil person perform good deeds? Are the deeds less admirable because the doer is a horrible human being? Does his character make his good works less beneficial? No, sez I.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jerry Lee Lewis redux [View all] cyclonefence Oct 2017 OP
His case is why we need taxpayer funded elections. Blue_true Oct 2017 #1
here's my two cents... Javaman Oct 2017 #2
Thanks for the background cyclonefence Oct 2017 #3
it's a good thought experiment... Javaman Oct 2017 #9
Corrolary... Wounded Bear Oct 2017 #4
Good example cyclonefence Oct 2017 #5
I don't get the Jerry Lee Lewis comparison. panader0 Oct 2017 #6
Somebody posted a week or so ago cyclonefence Oct 2017 #7
There was a discussion last week about good art coming from bad people Orrex Oct 2017 #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jerry Lee Lewis redux