Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance dropped case against Trump kids after a big donation [View all]sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)17. US has legalized political corruption
Any politician who takes campaign money to favor a contributor is by usual definition, corrupt.
The US has just decided, farcically, that such implicit quid pro quos are technically legal.
There is no bigger issue corrupting US democracy than this.
Lots of reading here:
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/books/review/zephyr-teachouts-corruption-in-america.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/in-theory/wp/2016/05/05/how-the-supreme-court-gets-corruption-totally-wrong/
How the Supreme Court gets corruption totally wrong
Members of Congress spend the majority of their time fundraising from wealthy donors, learning the smallest details about donors' lives at the expense of learning about the policy details most relevant to their legislative work. When they're not fundraising, members may be anxious about meeting their fundraising quotas set by the national committees, or worried about offending the secret donors to powerful super PACs. This lurking fear undoubtedly shapes policy decisions, lest a wrong move trigger a deluge of attack ads from special interests.
The Supreme Court has said that none of this is corrupt or corrupting. That defies law, history and logic.
(You're using the technical legal defn of bribery discussed above. As the law stands today. That current law is a big problem for american democracy. It allows politicians to be purchased. That's what's created today's billionaire-controlled GOP.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance dropped case against Trump kids after a big donation [View all]
Maraya1969
Oct 2017
OP
What is a better word? Maybe they should leave out the reference to Trump altogether?
Maraya1969
Oct 2017
#3
Campaign contributions are in practice corruption (see articles I linked from Z Teachout)
sharedvalues
Oct 2017
#19
This is the same as Trump's donation to FL AG Bondi. And it is still be investigated
Maraya1969
Oct 2017
#25
Because it is illegal to take money from someone under investigation and meet with them.
L. Coyote
Oct 2017
#15
Read the articles I linked above. It SHOULD be illegal, but SCOTUS defined it away.
sharedvalues
Oct 2017
#20
It was label as a "Campaign contribution" Chances are it went into his pocket eventually
Maraya1969
Oct 2017
#26
Because he got $35,000 after the fact. Then he got $50,000 a few years later
Maraya1969
Oct 2017
#22