Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Ken Burch (Reply #120)

Diane Feinstein announcement [View all] brooklynite Oct 2017 OP
K&R... spanone Oct 2017 #1
The popular complaint is that she's too old. kstewart33 Oct 2017 #79
CA greeny2323 Oct 2017 #2
Settling? Why smear Feinstein? She's an honorable and capable and experienced public servant... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #9
What Nurse Jackie said. BadgerMom Oct 2017 #21
+1,000,000 DarthDem Oct 2017 #77
### NurseJackie Oct 2017 #78
She is hell on wheels. Bad ass & good heart. Alice11111 Oct 2017 #80
Hell-on-wheels... PERFECT!! NurseJackie Oct 2017 #82
Tough lady👩🗽💯💪💥 Alice11111 Oct 2017 #163
Backatcha DarthDem Oct 2017 #86
This & More Me. Oct 2017 #100
The More Me. Oct 2017 #101
Awesome! Impressive! With EXPERIENCE comes ACCOMPLISHMENTS, eh? But... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #104
I've Asked In This Thread What Exactly Is A True Progressive Me. Oct 2017 #106
I'd noticed that your previous question was being ignored. It's a valid question... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #107
It's All That Me. Oct 2017 #109
Nurse Jackie, you give the best accounting of why Feinstein should be supported, not denigrated. NBachers Oct 2017 #151
If only they would do just that... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #161
"Give voters a choice", i.e., divide the Democratic Party even more. George II Oct 2017 #17
The GOP is so weak in California that last time, there were TWO Democratic candidates for Senate Ken Burch Oct 2017 #93
What is the % of, as you put it, "true progressives" in the California Democratic voter rolls? George II Oct 2017 #97
What Exactly Is A True Progressive According To You Me. Oct 2017 #102
"True Progressives" NastyRiffraff Oct 2017 #105
It's a not-so-subtle way to smear Feinstein. And it's not the first time... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #108
Critique is not "smearing". Ken Burch Oct 2017 #113
Accusing Feinstein of not being a "true progressive" is a smear. There was no "critique"... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #119
Perhaps, having a choice of candidates is just a little TOO much democracy for some people. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #154
I hope not.I want a Democrat Senato rand Feinstein's seat could be up for grabs if some unknown won. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #18
Remember what happened to the republicans in Indiana Chipper Chat Oct 2017 #24
The way California works it's Senate races now, that's highly unlikely RhodeIslandOne Oct 2017 #38
exactly right...you get an unknown that is a wack job or can be portrayed as such by the GOP...we Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #70
The way the Senate race... tonedevil Oct 2017 #129
I am aware of this...but we need Feinstein's experience (very senior ) at the moment...and Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #157
If she runs against a Republican... tonedevil Oct 2017 #162
That is meaningless to me... Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #165
Are you a California... tonedevil Oct 2017 #166
I think that money and effort is better at flipping red seats DBoon Oct 2017 #26
Greeny2323 doesn't want to "settle" ? Steven Maurer Oct 2017 #30
As a Californian, I'd say we're damn lucky to have her, and obviously I have a lot of company Hekate Oct 2017 #42
Opposition noted. Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #44
Done. roody Oct 2017 #91
Good! Happy to see this! NurseJackie Oct 2017 #3
Time to get on her bandwagon, then on to victory. democratisphere Oct 2017 #4
Getting on her bandwagon now means nothing can ever change in CA. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #94
When is the California Senate Democratic Primary scheduled in 2018? George II Oct 2017 #95
You make an excellent point. It's rather hypocritical to excuse it in one instance and... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #98
They found a pretext to stop it. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #111
The top two candidate system has been in place for a while in California Gothmog Oct 2017 #114
That was my point, actually. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #116
There is still no primary under California law Gothmog Oct 2017 #143
TMYK ★ ... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #144
The top two system IS a primary. It's just not a closed primary. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #156
How exactly will one primary Senator Feinstein under this system in the real world? Gothmog Oct 2017 #160
She'd need to be knocked into THIRD place. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #164
In the real world, this will not happen Gothmog Oct 2017 #167
Well, you see now... there's your mistake right there... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #168
This isn't an argument between you and I Ken Burch Oct 2017 #169
In the real world, there is no way to primary Feinstein Gothmog Oct 2017 #170
In the real world, I wasn't the one suggesting it Ken Burch Oct 2017 #171
California does have a primary, just not individual primaries for each party. So essentially.... George II Oct 2017 #125
I didn't say California DIDN'T have a primary. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #133
Most likely but not definitely. Looking down the list of candidates from less than a year ago.... George II Oct 2017 #136
If you're basing that on support levels, the top two were the most likely to win Ken Burch Oct 2017 #138
What pretext was that? (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #158
So you live in California? JHan Oct 2017 #103
No, but I've seen how it works. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #112
really? JHan Oct 2017 #115
The GOP is dead in Cali. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #117
No, the really is to you making an insinuation that progressives are oppressed in California. JHan Oct 2017 #118
I didn't use or even think the term "oppressed"-that would be insensitive. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #120
I consider Jerry Brown to be progressive minded and he's governor. JHan Oct 2017 #121
The term "litmus test" is heavy-handed. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #137
"Those positions seem to be reserved for 'centrists', for some reason." NurseJackie Oct 2017 #123
I didn't mean the meaning that person took from it. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #134
LOL! NurseJackie Oct 2017 #142
"And given that she's unbeatable, what difference does it make what I say about her?" lapucelle Oct 2017 #147
Exactly! I've smelled this type of thing before. NurseJackie Oct 2017 #159
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2017 #150
Sorry. From now on I won't. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #152
Your thread title is simply absurd. brer cat Oct 2017 #122
... skylucy Oct 2017 #5
If she's willing and able, why not? oasis Oct 2017 #6
What's your definition of able? awesomerwb1 Oct 2017 #10
She seems to be doing ok after recent pacemaker proceedure. If reelected, oasis Oct 2017 #13
I agree experience counts a lot awesomerwb1 Oct 2017 #22
Do you have a video of one of these moments? Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #45
DiFi is almost 15 years older than Trump, and he's senile and she's NOT... Hekate Oct 2017 #60
Thank you, Hekate! sheshe2 Oct 2017 #145
So right about RBG... she's a dynamo!! Just gotta hope she NEVER retires before we put a Dem back in InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #155
I'm sure you'll be able to find them yourself n/t awesomerwb1 Oct 2017 #64
Is this one of the ones you are referencing? Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #81
Oh I see, you just smear and run Hekate Oct 2017 #149
She is in the Senate not the house. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #71
Good for her. Bad news for her enemies. Hortensis Oct 2017 #7
We need new leaders who might run for President some day Cicada Oct 2017 #8
They're coming. Great experience and power connections are GOOD things. Hortensis Oct 2017 #19
The Senate is not a training ground for President. Incidentally, look back in history.... George II Oct 2017 #20
Yeah, the senate is a tough place from which to run zipplewrath Oct 2017 #69
So no Kamala Harris for Prez then? BeyondGeography Oct 2017 #126
Did you see the post to which I responded? Context is the key. George II Oct 2017 #127
Is Harris 2020 a non-starter because shes in the Senate? BeyondGeography Oct 2017 #128
We have a long way to 2020. My point was that here in 2017 we should not be looking... George II Oct 2017 #131
My point is there's a cost associated with people who effectively benefit from lifetime tenure BeyondGeography Oct 2017 #132
I seriously doubt that when Californians first elected Dianne Feinstein they weren't thinking.... George II Oct 2017 #135
I defer to the many Californians on this board BeyondGeography Oct 2017 #139
All I can say is that the candidates should put their names in and run. The voters will decide.... George II Oct 2017 #141
when garnett finishes a term for governor. he will make a great president DBoon Oct 2017 #28
Be great if Garcetti would build a powerful delisen Oct 2017 #35
That is up to Mayor Garcetti. nt. Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #46
It is easier for a rich man to get into Heaven.... Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #53
3.6M reasons she is going to win Not Ruth Oct 2017 #11
The Senate is a 6 year term crazycatlady Oct 2017 #12
"Hell, yeah!" on the 71 yo!!!!! MyOwnPeace Oct 2017 #32
Lately there's been some done crazycatlady Oct 2017 #34
and a much younger vp who perhaps is crazed. delisen Oct 2017 #36
considering what Meg Whitman spent in California several years back NewJeffCT Oct 2017 #15
That may be the number of votes she got, but I'd have to look it up from an actual computer Hekate Oct 2017 #50
That's disappointing. MoonRiver Oct 2017 #14
I'm a Californian and glad she's running again. She and Kamala Harris are a great team. iluvtennis Oct 2017 #16
I'm kind of hoping that you don't have Harris for much longer Orrex Oct 2017 #43
LOL, I'd love that, but don't see it happening in our current hate filled US environment iluvtennis Oct 2017 #65
Sigh Lunabell Oct 2017 #23
Thank you DiFi! We need more of you. leftofcool Oct 2017 #25
Kr Cryptoad Oct 2017 #27
She has been at it long enough BadGimp Oct 2017 #29
I don't get it hueymahl Oct 2017 #31
You are not correct in your observations. You leave out a lot. Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #51
Senator Feinstein does not lead the Democratic Party. She is a US Senator doing a tremendous job Hekate Oct 2017 #52
+++++ .. tell me how and why this needs explaining? JHan Oct 2017 #56
Honest to God I do not know why Hekate Oct 2017 #59
yup..for emphasis... JHan Oct 2017 #61
Voting for war. roody Oct 2017 #92
She is absolutely A leader of the party hueymahl Oct 2017 #58
Too old. Is she trying to set a record? maxsolomon Oct 2017 #33
My Magic 8-Ball says it is 'Very doubtful' she will break Strom Thurmond's record Brother Buzz Oct 2017 #39
You can't beat it if you don't try I guess maxsolomon Oct 2017 #40
Absolutely! Madam45for2923 Oct 2017 #49
California's Senator Cornelius Cole was first elected at age 86 pnwmom Oct 2017 #54
What then do you believe is the allowable maximum age to be effective LanternWaste Oct 2017 #57
How old are you anyway? maxsolomon Oct 2017 #66
It's amazing how many people bring up gun violence, forgetting how she became Mayor... Hekate Oct 2017 #62
I'm not. I think she should retire. I know how she became Mayor. maxsolomon Oct 2017 #68
Good. If folks want to see her replaced, convince the voters to do it. SaschaHM Oct 2017 #37
It costs money...and is stupid to use if for a primary. Use the money against Republicans. Demsrule86 Oct 2017 #72
Propping up another Democrat candidate such that we have another Top 2 finish in the primary.. SaschaHM Oct 2017 #74
Meh, the wrong "older" Senator retired in CA RhodeIslandOne Oct 2017 #41
Great news! DEMS FTW! Madam45for2923 Oct 2017 #47
It looks like in CA if she fails to finish the term the governor appoints someone Lee-Lee Oct 2017 #48
Bravo. I hope the Russians don't primary her. L. Coyote Oct 2017 #55
No kidding Hekate Oct 2017 #63
I've read that a competitive primary could be better for the CA Dem Party liskddksil Oct 2017 #67
You'd also bring out those on the left, who would stay home since Feinstein SaschaHM Oct 2017 #75
No, but I certainly wouldnt mind if another Democrat did Nevernose Oct 2017 #84
I'm thrilled Dianne Feinstein is running for re-election to the Senate from California. Spy Car Oct 2017 #73
I think it's going to be Dem against Dem In November, 2018. RandySF Oct 2017 #76
For the Primary? DarthDem Oct 2017 #87
The general. RandySF Oct 2017 #88
I Know :) DarthDem Oct 2017 #90
I'm opposed to her decision, but I don't live in California. Tatiana Oct 2017 #83
At that age........ Tavarious Jackson Oct 2017 #85
Id like to know if she were grooming someone for later Starry Messenger Oct 2017 #89
I wish Senators Kennedy and Byrd had done so loyalsister Oct 2017 #124
And the usual suspects on the purity left are already declaring war Blue_Tires Oct 2017 #96
Depressing. zentrum Oct 2017 #99
So what are you doing to find someone? brooklynite Oct 2017 #140
Incumbents have name recognition and money in the bank BeyondGeography Oct 2017 #146
smh. nt m-lekktor Oct 2017 #110
I think it's important to look at her record. What has she done for Californians or Am citizens? YOHABLO Oct 2017 #130
I am not from California. Willie Pep Oct 2017 #148
Feinstein's been our Senator while California has evolved into it's current "progressive" status. NBachers Oct 2017 #153
+1000, NBachers. From the LA Times "...and I'm no rabble rouser." Hortensis Oct 2017 #172
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Diane Feinstein announcem...»Reply #150