Open Letter to CNN (Lemon and Burnett)

[LiberalLovinLug]

73. I think the word "obligated" is too strong

And I think its somewhat disingenuous for reasons given in the OP and I think it also smacks of desperation by CNN to try as they might to convince any Republicans left watching them that they are not partison against their dear leader. But as to the question, of all prominent Democrats, even if now private citizens, Obama and Hillary be singled out about having a quicker response?

1. Obama was the outgoing President. A two term President. One that most likely also benefited from contributions of Weinstein, as well as the fact that Weinstein could be painted as the epitiomy of the liberal elite of Hollywood. So even the appearance of shying away from criticizing him is taken a certain way. And also living with the reality that Democrats are expected live up to standards that Republicans left in the dust years ago.

2. Hillary definitely benefited financially from Weinstein for her campaign. She also won the popular vote, including large support from women's groups and organizations. And the very obvious comparisons of Weinstein's to Trump's behavior, when that Hollywood access tape was, (and rightfully so), used by her campaign as a hammer on him.