Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PoindexterOglethorpe

(28,493 posts)

2. Not necessarily.

Reply to NewsCenter28 (Original post)

Wed Oct 11, 2017, 06:48 PM

Oct 2017

We could win huge in strongly Democratic districts, and just barely lose in Republican ones, have at least that much of an overall lead, but it would mean squat. It's district by district.

It's why Hillary isn't President. Not the right votes in the right places.

We have to be very smart and savvy about next year's election.

Wish we had Howard Dean as Party Chair.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So lets say Economist poll is right and we win the house popular by 7 points in 18 [View all] NewsCenter28 Oct 2017 OP

The House is gerrymandered but a seven point lead should do the trick. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #1

Not necessarily. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #2

If we win the generic ballot by seven points it is more likely than not we win the House. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #4

The generic ballot isn't that useful. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #7

Which scenario is more likely DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2017 #8

You said it! PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2017 #9

Wish we had Howard Dean as Party Chair. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ pangaia Oct 2017 #6

Don't look at me caraher Oct 2017 #3

Me too. moose65 Oct 2017 #5