Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Caliman73

(11,767 posts)
4. Term limits are a panacea.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 12:45 PM
Oct 2017

They sound like a good idea but the reality is that they just bring new lambs to the slaughter and get rid of institutional memory. The problem isn't that people are in office too long. The problem is money in politics. With term limits you lose seasoned leaders but who stays around in Washington or State capitols? The lobbyists, and the staffers, who end up having out sized influence, especially over new and inexperienced politicians coming in.

Elections are natural term limits. The problem is that American voters are usually apathetic and/or ignorant. There are problems with the advantages that incumbency brings, but mainly it is the money and lobby strength that makes incumbency so difficult to get around.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) i...»Reply #4