Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,301 posts)

1. Not providing a subsidy for simply having a third is not a penalty.

Fri Oct 13, 2017, 09:36 AM

Oct 2017

It's something more need to consider.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

UK has penalty for 3rd child?!? [View all] bobbieinok Oct 2017 OP

Not providing a subsidy for simply having a third is not a penalty. Weekend Warrior Oct 2017 #1

My impression was bobbieinok Oct 2017 #4