General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Womens Conference runs into rough seas of their own making [View all]KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I bet you admire the 1977 feminist leadership because it focused on economic issues. Back then, we thought that if only we got economic equality, the battle would have been won. Griswold and Roe made us think we were winning, if we had not already won, the battle of reproductive freedom, and the idea that racism would also be solved with economic equality was rampant in what was, back then, a very white feminist leadership.
We were wrong. 2016 showed us how wrong we were. Roe is being lost. Griswold is next. Intersectionality is the only way forward, because race and sexual orientation and gender is what is the basis for economic inequality, not the other way around. We don't have economic equality because of racism, sexism, and homophobia. Get rid of the latter, and economic justice will follow.
I am sorry to see men on a democratic message board have your opinions, Ken. You are wrong. Many, many women leaders have the heroic, radical spirit of 1977 and 1848 - but unlike some, they have learned the lessons of the intervening 40 (169) years, and have changed their message, their tactics, and their solutions as a result.
Just because we are not asking for what you want us to ask for - just because we are not focusing on economic issues, but rather on social justice issues, doesn't mean we are "staying the course, asking for as little as possible." Shame on you for saying so.