General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Womens Conference runs into rough seas of their own making [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)I don't want party cheerleaders, and being one makes her part of the establishment. Yes it does. I want thoughtful analysis. Sure, when she was advocating for Obama she was hard on Clinton, but she demonstrates that she isn't interested in nuance, she's interested in supporting her team to the detriment of truthfulness, in my opinion. She comes across to me as more of what is termed a Democratic Strategist, and it is through that lens that she appears to filter her content.
Now granted, I don't listen to her every day, and admittedly, this is a snap judgement from my limited exposure to her. I'm actually just willing to go out on a limb and make that call based on the evidence I've seen. If you can show me that I've got it wrong, I will absolutely be contrite for going off half-cocked. I'm in a gambling mood though.