Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

why the chain of command failed to anticipate "even the possibility of an ambush".... Not Ruth Oct 2017 #1
Lawsuit because of what happened on a deployment? Sanity Claws Oct 2017 #3
Why would you throw out a lawsuit against the military? Not Ruth Oct 2017 #10
Look up sovereign immunity sarisataka Oct 2017 #15
It wouldn't even need a motion sarisataka Oct 2017 #17
lawsuit?? unblock Oct 2017 #5
Why didn't the republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief do something? Achilleaze Oct 2017 #2
We need to ask more questions about wtf is going on in Niger MattP Oct 2017 #4
How can the chain of command fail this badly, the ENTIRE Mission was a disaster. Sunlei Oct 2017 #6
Somebody is leaking this shit to the enemy and it's coming from the White House elehhhhna Oct 2017 #8
You could be right, can't see how BOTH Trumps Largest Special forces missions can FAIL this badly! Sunlei Oct 2017 #9
Indications are he was alive when they left him GusBob Oct 2017 #7
The widow needs to sue Not Ruth Oct 2017 #11
alive when he was left behind! My God, our Green Berets would NEVER leave someone behind. Sunlei Oct 2017 #12
I agree. cwydro Oct 2017 #14
In the normal military world Corgigal Oct 2017 #19
I agree, this is NOT a normal military world. Changed so fast, just the past 9? months. TWO! Ship Sunlei Oct 2017 #20
But, BENGAZI!!!! winstars Oct 2017 #13
Oh My malaise Oct 2017 #16
Sure as hell do Tom Rinaldo Oct 2017 #21
Thanks for that malaise Oct 2017 #22
I hope there is an investigation. SweetieD Oct 2017 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Missing in discussion of ...»Reply #4