Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Wwcd

(6,288 posts)
10. Here's a good synopsis of this morning with Sessions
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 12:35 PM
Oct 2017
https://mobile.twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/920669158706155522


Seth Abramson
@SethAbramson
BREAKING:

Sessions admits under oath he discussed Trump's Russia policy in a long-undisclosed—lied about—September '16 meeting with Kislyak.

That Sessions discussed Russia policy with Kislyak is something I wrote about here three months ago, but it was never picked up by media.

I was contacted by Congressional staffers back then. I explained how Sessions' last testimony *inadvertently* revealed these discussions.

Now Leahy's questions have made clear the fact Sessions was essentially negotiating sanctions policy with Russia during the campaign.

Given that Trump was legally on notice Russia was committing crimes as of 8/17/16 his NatSec chief COULD NOT LEGALLY negotiate sanctions.

6/ 3 weeks after Trump knew Russia was committing crimes, he had his NatSec chief negotiate sanctions relief with Russia. That IS collusion.

7/ Proof of collusion is right in front of us now. Sessions agreed to meet with Kislyak AT THE RNC—it was a POLITICAL meeting Trump knew of.

8/ A presidential campaign CANNOT LEGALLY learn a foreign power is committing crimes against the U.S. and then offer them aid and comfort.

9/ We know from reports Trump's plan was to unilaterally drop sanctions his first month in office. So Sessions would have told Kislyak this?

10/ Sessions says he talked Trump's Russia policy with Kislyak in mid-2016. That policy was to drop sanctions. In context, that's collusion.

PS/ At this point, EVERY question the Democrats ask Sessions today should be about his September 2016 meeting with Kislyak—and its context.

PS2/ Any conversations Sessions had with CANDIDATE TRUMP about his then-upcoming Kislyak meeting couldn't be covered by executive privilege.

Continues at link

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree with your post, Mira True Dough Oct 2017 #1
It is connected Mira Oct 2017 #4
Sorry, I wasn't implying that you should feel compelled to remove it True Dough Oct 2017 #6
I started to hate it earlier Mira Oct 2017 #7
Last paragraph...Nails! Cracklin Charlie Oct 2017 #2
The Peter Principle? guillaumeb Oct 2017 #3
I doubt Donald's Peter Principle Big_K Oct 2017 #16
I believe pond scum is above all of them. n/t raven mad Oct 2017 #5
that's not what the Peter Principle is grantcart Oct 2017 #8
I was hot and bothered, Mira Oct 2017 #14
I understand. My wife has taken to called me Mr Parkinson grantcart Oct 2017 #15
We are running out of words Lifelong Protester Oct 2017 #9
Here's a good synopsis of this morning with Sessions Wwcd Oct 2017 #10
Thanks for the copy/paste canetoad Oct 2017 #12
You're welcome Wwcd Oct 2017 #13
Rec for subject line rusty fender Oct 2017 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About Jefferson Beauregar...»Reply #10