Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(76,846 posts)
8. Little Evidence?
Thu Oct 19, 2017, 06:24 PM
Oct 2017

Little? There's is absolutely no evidence. Even in the "tax cut halcyon days" of the 80's, the economic stimulus was borrowing a trillion dollars to spend on defense contractors. When the economy was only about 6 trillion, that's 16.6% over 7 years, excluding the velocity of money which nearly tripled that. The equivalent of spending 60% of GDP which would look like 5.96% nominal growth. Take away inflation which averaged 4% (when including energy inflation) and it's 1.96% real growth in 7 years. The debt load increase negated any macroeconomic value.

So, not only is there "little" evidence that tax cuts boost economic growth, there is AMPLE evidence that the opposite is true. They do nothing, and more than likely, hurt economic growth.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Theres little historical ...»Reply #8