Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorGAC

(77,681 posts)
6. I Know People Who Work At Pew
Fri Oct 20, 2017, 12:17 PM
Oct 2017

I know of nobody that would experiment and then publish the results. The experimental polling would be to refine the methodology that would then result in publishable results.

To do otherwise is statistically invalid and sloppy science.

And three of your reasons have nothing to do with polling. People polled can still have a preference and suppression might stop them from acting on that choice, but that would apply to any pollster.

They're only measuring preferences. People have preferences whether others have conspired to take away their voting rights, or not. Same with theft by voting machine. The people still had a person for whom they were going to vote. The machine stealing the vote doesn't change the preference identified in the polling. And all the instant communications stuff influences preference, but it doesn't affect the way the preference is measured.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»538: Calm Down About Thos...»Reply #6