General Discussion

cwydro

(51,308 posts)

19. What?

Reply to snooper2 (Reply #5)

Tue Oct 24, 2017, 11:44 AM

Oct 2017

“Slant eye”?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sarah Sanders: Comparing Niger to Benghazi is 'just a cheap attempt to try to taint this president' [View all] DonViejo Oct 2017 OP

We learned the cheap attempts to taint from y'all. nt HopeAgain Oct 2017 #1

+1 treestar Oct 2017 #13

Every time I see her I think..."Isn't it early for the Halloween witch costume?" Moostache Oct 2017 #2

Taint Trump? imanamerican63 Oct 2017 #3

he is the real agent orange Motley13 Oct 2017 #7

In the end, I believe this will be worse. dewsgirl Oct 2017 #4

slant eye is showin quite a bit of cleavage. I don't think her daddy would like that snooper2 Oct 2017 #5

What? cwydro Oct 2017 #19

Yeah, something going on with her right eye, maybe the perma-scowl is growing? snooper2 Oct 2017 #21

She has some weird idea of makeup, for sure. cwydro Oct 2017 #22

I read that she had a "lazy eye" mainstreetonce Oct 2017 #28

I'm not going to mock her murielm99 Oct 2017 #44

The fat bags in her eye brows are getting larger and larger lapfog_1 Oct 2017 #29

Well, fuck her for trying to president this taint. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Oct 2017 #6

Damn it. Your supposed to include ... Whiskeytide Oct 2017 #8

Other way around, HuckaBS... JHB Oct 2017 #9

Absolutely correct. (eom) StevieM Oct 2017 #70

As opposed to the millions spent by KGOP to taint Hillary? MrsCoffee Oct 2017 #10

Except in this case, there is actual fault with the administration, unlike Benghazi NightWatcher Oct 2017 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #12

I don't think you have any information or authority to suggest that folks stop demanding answers MrsCoffee Oct 2017 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #18

Yours is a most creative and convenient allegation. LanternWaste Oct 2017 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #31

What's astounding is that Benghazi was no Bengazhi, Hortensis Oct 2017 #43

THANK YOU. VOX Oct 2017 #45

Lol. The lunatic zeal over Benghazi is on a shelf alongside Hortensis Oct 2017 #47

Theyre so damned aggressive; and coiled very tightly. VOX Oct 2017 #49

Well put. A WaPo writer was just choosing her words delicately, Hortensis Oct 2017 #50

And yet Trump dragged one of the Benghazi Mothers kskiska Oct 2017 #63

You do not know that. cwydro Oct 2017 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #17

Niger should be given no more attention nor money than they've invested in Benghazi. forgotmylogin Oct 2017 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #33

I'm in no way saying we should waste resources to the extent they did. forgotmylogin Oct 2017 #46

No, Niger is potentially VASTLY more troublesome if the Chad Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #36

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #39

The adding of Chad to the no travel ban supposedly resulted in them removing their troops in Niger Kentonio Oct 2017 #53

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #57

It's not that simple though, is it. Kentonio Oct 2017 #58

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #59

Well feel free to provide us with some actual evidence to back up what you're saying. Kentonio Oct 2017 #60

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #61

So surely this should be a simple 5 minute job for the pentagon to show then? Kentonio Oct 2017 #62

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #65

Sorry but I think your own inside knowledge is making you overly dismissive of those who know less Kentonio Oct 2017 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #69

I'm not dismissive of your insight Kentonio Oct 2017 #73

Yeah, it's worse. alarimer Oct 2017 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #40

The difference is this current president's indifference. alarimer Oct 2017 #41

You do know Benghazi wasn't what it was sold as, right? herding cats Oct 2017 #42

The investigation. KY_EnviroGuy Oct 2017 #68

This message was self-deleted by its author Baconator Oct 2017 #72

Thanks for the good info. All sounds very reasonable. KY_EnviroGuy Oct 2017 #74

I'm sure the serious journalists at Fox and Friends also asked her... Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2017 #14

They are in a complete meltdown. chelsea0011 Oct 2017 #20

someone please open the door bdtrppr6 Oct 2017 #24

Impossible; the president is 100% taint. eShirl Oct 2017 #25

Um...newsflash Sarah....your president is a taint... Docreed2003 Oct 2017 #27

How dare you do to us what we do to you. . . BarbaRosa Oct 2017 #30

Apparently the quibble is about price. They had to spend way more to taint hillary. unblock Oct 2017 #32

Why cant Huckabee see whats clearly in front of her? C_U_L8R Oct 2017 #34

How would one actually attempt to taint a known shit stain? WyattKansas Oct 2017 #35

He's already tainted, you liar. alarimer Oct 2017 #37

Liars going to keep lying. Initech Oct 2017 #48

She's as bad ... LenaBaby61 Oct 2017 #51

Hey Sarah---taint my president neither randr Oct 2017 #52

No one needs to taint this pResident. He does a fine job all by himself. appleannie1943 Oct 2017 #54

No one has to try to "taint this president." He's doing a great job of it on his own. Vinca Oct 2017 #55

LOL - she's such a bad liar SharonClark Oct 2017 #56

Yes, you vacuous POS, Benghazi was a "cheap attempt" Cosmocat Oct 2017 #64

"CHEAP"? It was frickin' FREE, Sarah Baby! WinkyDink Oct 2017 #67

It is sickening that the GOP won the first election after Benghazi. It allows them some leeway to StevieM Oct 2017 #71