Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They said no to a white nationalist. Now Penn State, Ohio State are being sued. [View all]X_Digger
(18,585 posts)34. Yes, you CAN yell fire in a crowded theater.
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/11/its-time-to-stop-using-the-fire-in-a-crowded-theater-quote/264449/
But those who quote Holmes might want to actually read the case where the phrase originated before using it as their main defense. If they did, they'd realize it was never binding law, and the underlying case, U.S. v. Schenck, is not only one of the most odious free speech decisions in the Court's history, but was overturned over 40 years ago.
First, it's important to note U.S. v. Schenck had nothing to do with fires or theaters or false statements. Instead, the Court was deciding whether Charles Schenck, the Secretary of the Socialist Party of America, could be convicted under the Espionage Act for writing and distributing a pamphlet that expressed his opposition to the draft during World War I. As the ACLU's Gabe Rottman explains, "It did not call for violence. It did not even call for civil disobedience."
First, it's important to note U.S. v. Schenck had nothing to do with fires or theaters or false statements. Instead, the Court was deciding whether Charles Schenck, the Secretary of the Socialist Party of America, could be convicted under the Espionage Act for writing and distributing a pamphlet that expressed his opposition to the draft during World War I. As the ACLU's Gabe Rottman explains, "It did not call for violence. It did not even call for civil disobedience."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They said no to a white nationalist. Now Penn State, Ohio State are being sued. [View all]
TexasTowelie
Oct 2017
OP
free speech has a cost, let any body speak anywhere as long as they post a cash bond
beachbum bob
Oct 2017
#1
I don't think that is true, no place has an obligation to give "free security"...
beachbum bob
Oct 2017
#19
There is no reason they need to speak at either of these colleges ...an alternative site
Demsrule86
Oct 2017
#8
If they want to speak at these venues they should have to pay for their own security or
blueinredohio
Oct 2017
#5
If this venue is made available to other speakers, then yes, they have to allow shitstains like this
X_Digger
Oct 2017
#21
true, but inciting people to riot or committ criminal acts is not covered as "free speech"
beachbum bob
Oct 2017
#20
Spencer's followers commit murder or attempted murder every time he speaks.
lagomorph777
Oct 2017
#22
His actual, real, explicit speech would need to be determined as "inciting a riot." Otherwise, no
WinkyDink
Oct 2017
#37
Oh, how funny. Never mind the crimes were a generation ago, and confined to certain men.
WinkyDink
Oct 2017
#33
Can I speak there, too? Because EVERYBODY HAS A RIGHT TO SPEAK ANYWHERE AT ANY TIME EVER, AMEN.
WinkyDink
Oct 2017
#32
... On Saturday, Spencer appeared at the University of Florida, where police say
struggle4progress
Oct 2017
#38