Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
14. Why not actually read the report in question?
Fri Oct 27, 2017, 02:53 PM
Oct 2017


"I assume the FBI was told of the call by the British company and they may have provided whatever backup that exists"

That's not even what the memo says.

"The memo says Britain's MI5 intelligence service calculated that the call came 25 minutes before Kennedy was shot in Dallas."

The FBI wasn't told anything by any primary source to that report. So, first off, we are dealing with third-hand information presenting a bare conclusion based on a "calculation" which is not explained.

Here is the memo:



It's just a notation of a time recalled by the person who was called. And, no, they probably didn't go digging through records of calls in less than 24 hours in the UK. Note that the call was made after business hours, and reported to the station at 0933.

The only "calculation" involved here is just subtracting the time zone difference from when the reporter said he/she got the call.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That would have been about 6 p.m. in Cambridge. n/t rzemanfl Oct 2017 #1
The only two problems being.... jberryhill Oct 2017 #2
Your second point makes no sense DavidDvorkin Oct 2017 #4
What was the method used here? jberryhill Oct 2017 #5
No calculation required DavidDvorkin Oct 2017 #15
Perhaps I was not being specific jberryhill Oct 2017 #16
Reported orally, not necessarily a recollection DavidDvorkin Oct 2017 #20
I'm obviously still being unclear jberryhill Oct 2017 #21
We can't be sure DavidDvorkin Oct 2017 #23
Now I'm not sure if there is a cognitive issue jberryhill Oct 2017 #24
Curious - why would you need GPS etc to calculate the time difference accurately? karynnj Oct 2017 #9
You wouldn't need GPS jberryhill Oct 2017 #10
One would imagine that if it was something noted by the FBI, the teleco karynnj Oct 2017 #11
"billing records retained by the phone company" jberryhill Oct 2017 #12
I am not familiar with the UK phone system, but I do know the Bell System of the 1970s karynnj Oct 2017 #13
Why not actually read the report in question? jberryhill Oct 2017 #14
It said "coincidental" phone calls of this nature had been received over the past year especially hlthe2b Oct 2017 #3
... Chiyo-chichi Oct 2017 #18
ahh, yes... Christine Keeler hlthe2b Oct 2017 #19
Heres a tip that happened the day of the assassination that never gets covered. stopbush Oct 2017 #6
The Oswald Didn't Act Alone ProfessorGAC Oct 2017 #7
Dayum! LOL BootinUp Oct 2017 #17
Tweety has the answer... GreatCaesarsGhost Oct 2017 #8
So what? Orangepeel Oct 2017 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»JFK assassination files: ...»Reply #14