Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(57,750 posts)
97. Jim Crow was indeed apartheid,
Sun Oct 29, 2017, 06:51 PM
Oct 2017

and there is academic literature establishing parallels between the two.

https://www.amazon.com/White-Supremacy-Comparative-American-African/dp/0195030427
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,24&qsp=1&q=comparison+of+south+africa+%22united+states%22

That you have never thought or read about it does not make it ridiculous.

Slavery existed throughout the Americas, but the US was the only nation to develop a system of segregation and systemic disenfranchisement. Like apartheid, it was created and enforced by the state, including the "party of FDR" we are told we should return to.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think Obama would have won in 2008, no matter what bearsfootball516 Oct 2017 #1
If Hillary had been nominated in 2008 MichMary Oct 2017 #4
The sexism problem was with the Democratic Primary in 2008 whopis01 Oct 2017 #5
So you think HRC ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #27
I think the OP is just saying sexism was a factor LisaM Oct 2017 #37
She lost by a tiny margin. Sexism could certainly have tipped the race to him. nt pnwmom Oct 2017 #66
I remember DU during 08 primary bobbieinok Oct 2017 #54
I was called "a old hag" for supporting HRC. LisaM Oct 2017 #60
One DUer said HRC was tired, disappointed old woman bobbieinok Oct 2017 #61
I left DU for two years after the 2008 primary. xmas74 Oct 2017 #79
In 2008 Clinton's enthusiastic collaboration with GWB was still in very recent memory Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #91
What on earth are you referring to? LisaM Oct 2017 #110
Post removed Post removed Oct 2017 #117
By "double down" do you mean "keep correcting those who said she lied?" ehrnst Oct 2017 #121
I don't accuse her of lying, I accuse her of being completely tone deaf Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #125
To blame Hillary for the Iraq war is beyond ridiculous. LisaM Oct 2017 #122
Nuance. ehrnst Oct 2017 #123
Nobody blames her for the Iraq war Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #126
So Hillary Clinton, a female, "married herself to Bush...."? What do you think.... George II Oct 2017 #124
If they, in 2007 were also joining the chorus against Iran Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #128
You mean like ehrnst Oct 2017 #137
Can explain what you mean by "enthusiastic collaboration?" ehrnst Oct 2017 #114
Yeah, I think that was a hit and run! LisaM Oct 2017 #115
(crickets) ehrnst Oct 2017 #116
Sorry for the inconvenience, I have a job. Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #118
And... ehrnst Oct 2017 #120
No, because this whole Iraq thing.. JHan Nov 2017 #143
This. Dear God, this. (nt) ehrnst Nov 2017 #144
What you said, bobbieinok. It was shocking. nt Hekate Oct 2017 #131
really? DonCoquixote Oct 2017 #52
Why would you post such a polarizing statement? It's not Obama's fault that Trump's president. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #74
What I meant was MichMary Oct 2017 #77
The reality was that '16 was going to be a problem year. Ken Burch Oct 2017 #87
Several of you blame the party without any proof that this is what the problem was. stevenleser Oct 2017 #107
OK...there were factors in and out of our control Ken Burch Oct 2017 #129
the problems in the house and senate go back decades Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #119
I disagree totally. No one could've beaten Obama in 2008. It was something like I had never seen... Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #132
Were you replying to me? MichMary Oct 2017 #135
That's beside the point. Sexism was still a factor, and that's wrong. n/t pnwmom Oct 2017 #65
It's a huge thing in every election with more than one gender on the ballot Lee-Lee Oct 2017 #2
I think they mean the 2008 primary and the 2016 general, not vice versa Not Ruth Oct 2017 #3
There was plenty of sexism in the 2016 primaries. comradebillyboy Oct 2017 #78
Are we supposed to be admitting GaryCnf Oct 2017 #6
The two reporters most credited with setting the tone turn out to be sexist pigs dsc Oct 2017 #8
So Obama won the nomination in 2008 GaryCnf Oct 2017 #11
anyone running in 2008 would have won a majority dsc Oct 2017 #12
You can pull out the MCLurkin crap all day and night if you wish BannonsLiver Oct 2017 #16
The media was on his side and he drew large crowds at rallies... LisaM Oct 2017 #63
I define it by who wins and loses BannonsLiver Oct 2017 #64
Ir certainly helps when the media favors you. LisaM Oct 2017 #67
That is pure revisionist history. GaryCnf Oct 2017 #17
I was referring to McClurkin not Wright the fact you didn't know that shows dsc Oct 2017 #18
Tell me about McClurkin's role GaryCnf Oct 2017 #41
I already did dsc Oct 2017 #43
So the character of someone who GaryCnf Oct 2017 #46
yes since he was warned just what he was when he had him do so dsc Oct 2017 #47
You're willingness to slander Obama GaryCnf Oct 2017 #48
It is not slander dsc Oct 2017 #50
Some folks scream sexism BannonsLiver Oct 2017 #20
Obama was a better candidate that is true Tavarious Jackson Oct 2017 #26
Not sure I agree ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #28
Sure she did. Tavarious Jackson Oct 2017 #29
But President Obama ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #30
He was only a state senator Tavarious Jackson Oct 2017 #33
I'm not arguing she wasn't qualified ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #35
I love them both Tavarious Jackson Oct 2017 #38
yup ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #39
Barack Obama won the US Senate seat in an election in 2004 . Yes he was also a state senator lunasun Oct 2017 #57
She was in the Senate for twice as long as he was dsc Oct 2017 #31
8 years versus 4 years isn't that much of a difference ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #32
By that reasoning John McCain was the best candidate lunasun Oct 2017 #58
That's good news.... tonedevil Oct 2017 #85
So what. The primary electorate that year didnt care. BannonsLiver Oct 2017 #55
Now imagine for a second that she had won in 08 dsc Oct 2017 #14
Lol you are trying to give Halpern way too much credit Egnever Oct 2017 #21
"the most racist nation on earth" former9thward Oct 2017 #40
I gather you are not black GaryCnf Oct 2017 #42
Oh, btw GaryCnf Oct 2017 #44
My original post stands. former9thward Oct 2017 #49
Now "Obama proved were not racists?" GaryCnf Oct 2017 #56
You really fail in logic. former9thward Oct 2017 #68
Do you mean I did not list one such country? GaryCnf Oct 2017 #70
Easy. former9thward Oct 2017 #71
Pay attention friend GaryCnf Oct 2017 #72
No, thousands of slaves weren't put on crosses and crucified like in Rome. former9thward Oct 2017 #75
Millions died in the Middle Passage BainsBane Oct 2017 #100
How is that on the U.S.? former9thward Oct 2017 #101
Where did the British import slaves to? BainsBane Oct 2017 #103
Additionally, the US maintained its own slave trade BainsBane Oct 2017 #105
Btw GaryCnf Oct 2017 #73
My copy of the Constitution is different than yours. former9thward Oct 2017 #76
Yes, I distinctly remember GaryCnf Oct 2017 #80
It did end. former9thward Oct 2017 #95
Coming from someone GaryCnf Oct 2017 #111
The institutions of transatlantic slavery was radically different BainsBane Oct 2017 #99
The only competition BainsBane Oct 2017 #94
No the U.S. did not have apartheid. former9thward Oct 2017 #96
Jim Crow was indeed apartheid, BainsBane Oct 2017 #97
Apartheid was an institutional failure that burned out quickly Sen. Walter Sobchak Oct 2017 #130
Although not the reason why Obama won, lapucelle Oct 2017 #104
Wow. I didn't remember all that. It's chilling what those media guys said. Chilling. Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #133
2008 was Obama's moment, lapucelle Oct 2017 #136
They were, statistically speaking, neck and neck. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #138
The qualifier "statistically speaking" obscures a greater truth GaryCnf Nov 2017 #140
"radically undercounts votes in caucus states" ehrnst Nov 2017 #141
Good point GaryCnf Nov 2017 #142
I voted for Obama in 2008 primary, in part, because I thought Clinton ran a despicable campaign. David__77 Oct 2017 #7
on the subjects of despicable campaigns dsc Oct 2017 #9
Yea. About that. . . When my brother told me he was voting for Trump... CousinIT Oct 2017 #10
Their reporting influenced how others reported mcar Oct 2017 #13
Yep. cwydro Oct 2017 #15
Yes, as long as we can also admit that it wasn't the only problem. meadowlander Oct 2017 #19
well, just accepting sexism isn't part of my game plan, that's for sure. nt TheFrenchRazor Oct 2017 #24
I don't accept it. meadowlander Oct 2017 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #83
You don't accept it? BainsBane Oct 2017 #90
+ a million! lunamagica Oct 2017 #92
The media was reluctant to cover HRC campaign events live because lapucelle Oct 2017 #93
Cool your jets. I voted for her and I know it wasn't her only message. meadowlander Oct 2017 #109
If you think that Hillary's message was "Vote for me, I'm female" you were obviously not paying lunamagica Oct 2017 #81
This is simply the lazy, non thinking, non factual attack so often used on Clinton that can in no Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #84
I know. It's baffling how someone can post such blanket, absurd, untrue statements and get away lunamagica Oct 2017 #88
I didn't say it was her only message, or even that it was her message at all. meadowlander Oct 2017 #108
This message was self-deleted by its author Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #82
That's one way to advertise that you never informed yourself BainsBane Oct 2017 #89
Nothing like broadcasting that you were a willfully uninformed voter. brer cat Oct 2017 #106
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Oct 2017 #113
Perhaps you don't understand the difference between "a huge problem" and "the only problem?" ehrnst Oct 2017 #112
I think the sexism does run deep marylandblue Oct 2017 #22
agree with you 100% nt Tavarious Jackson Oct 2017 #25
I'm male ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #34
it is, but some people will never admit it. nt TheFrenchRazor Oct 2017 #23
Absolutely. lindysalsagal Oct 2017 #86
Admit or not, it is a reality. Not a tough one. As the hate for Obama stemmed from bigotry, Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #45
And still is a big problem. eom guillaumeb Oct 2017 #51
how are we going to win 2018 and 2020 DonCoquixote Oct 2017 #53
No!!!! Not in 2008......... USALiberal Oct 2017 #59
I agree about Obama. No one could've beaten him. But sexism was involved... Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #134
Both sides took turns savaging Hillary Awsi Dooger Oct 2017 #62
Oh great, let's not re-fight the 2016 primary, let's go all the way back to 2008! X_Digger Oct 2017 #69
While an Obama supporter in 08, Sanders in 16 - I do agree sexism existed lovemydogs Oct 2017 #98
::Carefully reviews thread:: ::sighs:: Apparently not. n/t TygrBright Oct 2017 #102
My reaction as well. ismnotwasm Oct 2017 #127
Yes, and the piece by Rebecca Traister which inspires the Vox Article is spot on... JHan Oct 2017 #139
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we admit finally that...»Reply #97