Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women adrift at sea for five months had beacon but didn't turn it on [View all]NotASurfer
(2,369 posts)18. So they had two choices
Option 1, adrift in a sailboat until it falls apart and sinks under you
Option 2, big red rescue me button...and go back to Trumptopia
Tell me five months ago you might not have thought long and hard about the first option too
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Women adrift at sea for five months had beacon but didn't turn it on [View all]
jmowreader
Oct 2017
OP
Then they are even bigger idiots than getting lost at sea for 5 months already indicated
mythology
Oct 2017
#25
It doesn't add up. I wonder if they were hoping for publicity and a book deal?
octoberlib
Oct 2017
#31
I think pretty much everybody noticed they looked really good for being five month adrift.
LisaL
Oct 2017
#48
I didn't get the impression that any 24hour danger was from exposure or illness or starvation
unblock
Oct 2017
#33
I guess that would have been a really good time to use that emergency beacon, then. No?
LisaL
Oct 2017
#35
They said they couldn't sail because of a broken spreader on the Vice story...
EX500rider
Oct 2017
#37